ABSTRACT.Purpose: To evaluate the clinical manifestations of tear production, distribution and drainage in the essential blepharospasm patients, and to analyse the changes after botulinum toxin A injection in these patients. Methods: This prospective study was performed in 23 patients with essential blepharospasm treated with Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A; Dysport, Ipsen Biopharm, UK) from November 2010 to February 2011. Ocular examinations, including frequency and severity of blepharospasm, tear break up time (BUT), Schirmer's test, lower lid tear meniscus height (TMH) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT, rtvue software version 3.5; Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA), and dacryoscintigraphy using 99m technetium pertechnetate, were performed before and 2 weeks after BoNT-A injection. We asked all patients about changes in the dry eye symptom score, before and after treatment. Results were analysed with independent t-test using spss software version 12.0 for Windows XP, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Botulinum neurotoxin A treatment relieved blepharospasm in all patients. Mean injection dose was 38 ± 5.6 units. After injection, mean tear BUT was significantly increased from 4.7 ± 4.9 to 6.6 ± 1.6 seconds (p = 0.001) Lower TMH increased in all three points and most notably at the lateral point (p = 0.05). On dacryoscintigraphy, tear drainage velocity was not affected by BoNT-A treatment. But Tc-99m 50% clearance time in interpalpebral fissure significantly increased from 1564 to 2220 seconds on the time activity curve (p = 0.027). Subjective dry eye symptoms also improved in 16 patients (70%) after injection. Conclusion: Tear film stability and TMH increased, but tear drainage velocity was not affected by BoNT-A treatment. Overall Tc-99m 50% clearance time in interpalpebral fissure significantly increased, and tear storage from mild lateral lower eyelid laxity increased after BoNT-A injection. Botulinum neurotoxin A injection was also effective for combined dry eye symptom in the essential blepharospasm patients.
. Purpose: Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography (FD ODT) for the evaluation of marginal tear film has not been performed in patients with watery eye or in a controlled study. We used FD OCT to evaluate the height of the lower lid tear film at three points in normal adults and compared it with two watery eye groups. Methods: We prospectively evaluated with FD OCT 25 normal subjects and 44 patients with a watery eye. Twenty‐three patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) and 21 patients with functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction (FNLDO) were enrolled. Three images were obtained by three vertical FD OCT scans centred on the lower eyelid and inferior cornea, the medial limbus and the lateral limbus. The tear meniscus height (TMH), tear meniscus depth (TMD) and tear meniscus area (TMA) were measured with computer calipers and compared at three points between the two groups. Results: Watery eyes have significantly greater median TMHs at three points (medial: 584 μm, central: 592 μm, lateral: 470 μm) than controls (274, 291, 205 μm, p < 0.001). Medial and central TMHs were higher than lateral TMH in controls and watery eyes. TMD and TMA also increased significantly in watery eyes (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in central TMH compared to medial TMH in FNLDOs than in PANDOs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Fourier‐domain OCT is a valuable clinical tool in the evaluation of TMH in normal and watery eyes. TMH at three points can be a useful clinical parameter that investigates changes of lower tear meniscus pattern in both PANDO and FNLDO groups.
We believe this report of calcification of the Akreos(®) MI-60 IOL is of clinicopathological importance. Long-term follow-up of diabetic patients implanted with this IOL should be maintained by surgeons and manufacturers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.