AbstrakEksistensi hak kesehatan sebagai fundamental right yang dimiliki oleh setiap individu telah diakui secara kontitusional. Hakikatnya, kesehatan harus dijamin dengan adanya suatu kepastian hukum melalui upaya peningkatan kualitas kesehatan. Namun, beberapa daerah masih memiliki keterbatasan akses pelayanan kesehatan dasar di puskesmas. Hambatan tersebut terlihat dari minimnya jumlah puskesmas dan kesenjangan fasilitas antardaerah, kurangnya berbagai faktor penunjang, serta terbatasnya kuantitas tenaga kesehatan yang akan mempengaruhi capaian kesehatan masyarakat. Pemberlakuan jam operasional dalam rangka mengurangi angka penyebaran covid-19 mengakibatkan terjadinya dua kondisi yang kontras. Kondisi pertama menimbulkan overcapacityyang berisiko memicu kerumunan, sedangkan kondisi kedua menyebabkan penurunan jumlah kunjungan masyarakat ke puskesmas. Hal ini perlu menjadi fokus pemerintah, guna meningkatkan pemerataan pelayanan kesehatan pada daerah terdampak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perlu strategi oleh pemerintah dalam mengatasi dinamika kesehatan sebagai suatu penyempurnaan kerangka kebijakan dalam mewujudkan target Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) pada sektor pelayanan kesehatan di daerah. Untuk itu, penulis beranggapan perlu adanya kepastian jaminan melalui Primary Health Care Improvement sebagai solusi alternatif yang tepat, guna meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan puskesmas di daerah terdampak dalam memitigasi covid-19. Abstract The existence of the right to health as a fundamental right that every individual owns has been recognized constitutionally. In essence, health must be guaranteed by the presence of a legal certainty through efforts to improve the quality of health. However, some areas still have limited access to essential health services at community health centres. These obstacles can be seen from the minimal number of community health centres and the gap in facilities between regions, the lack of various supporting factors, and the limited quantity of health workers that will affect public health outcomes. The implementation of operating hours to reduce the spread of COVID-19 resulted in two contrasting conditions. The first condition causes overcapacity, which risks crowds, while the second condition causes a decrease in the number of community visits to the community health centres. These conditions need to be the government's focus to increase the distribution of health services in affected areas. This study uses a normative legal research method with an approach to legislation and literature study. The results of this study indicate that the government needs a strategy in overcoming the dynamics of health as a refinement of the policy framework in realizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets in the regional health service sector. For this reason, the authors think that there is a need for guarantees through Primary Health Care Improvement as an appropriate alternative solution to improve the quality of community health centres services in affected areas in mitigating COVID-19.

Abstrak : Implementasi diversi bertujuan menghindari kriminalisasi anak dalam penyelesaian perkara di Pengadilan Liwa. Akan tetapi, faktanya jumlah penerapan diversi pada jenis tindak pidana pencurian oleh anak dalam kurun waktu lima tahun terakhir hanya berjumlah 6 perkara dari 69 perkara. Penulis menyadari bahwa memang tidak semua perkara dapat berhasil melaksanakan diversi karena terdapat berbagai hambatan pada fakta di lapangan seperti minimnya pemahaman masyarakat dan pihak korban, serta hakim yang menangani perkara anak sampai saat ini terdapat perbedaan pandangan dalam upaya diversi anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris, yaitu melakukan pendekatan secara langsung ke Pengadilan Negeri liwa dalam memperoleh data-data penyelesaian upaya diversi terhadap kasus anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pencurian di Pengadilan Negeri Liwa. Kemudian penulis juga menerapkan pendekatan analisis deskriptif untuk mengelola data kualitatif beserta metode deduktif dalam menyimpulkan permasalahan. Diharapkan penelitian ini dapat memberikan pemecahan atas persoalan diversi yang terjadi, dan meningkatkan jumlah proses diversi di masa mendatang.

The existence of restorative justice certainly brings a new paradigm in the settlement of criminal cases, with the settlement of cases solely out of court. Restorative justice-based law enforcement as manifested in all law enforcement agencies, especially the Prosecutor's Office in prosecuting cases based on the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 Year 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The application of the amount required to prosecute restoratives can be applied to the crime of theft as the highest case in Indonesia. This happened because the disrupted economy after the Covid-19 pandemic created a moral crisis with drastic theft crimes in Indonesia. Meanwhile, it was recently discovered that the establishment of a restorative justice house in each jurisdiction of the attorney general's office was found to optimize the resolution of all legal problems by screening cases that go to court, socializing the law to local residents, and being able to develop local wisdom. involving local traditional leaders to emphasize deliberation. This research uses normative legal research methods through the approach of applicable laws and regulations and literature study. The legislative approach is sourced from primary data and literature studies. Then in analyzing the problem, the author uses a descriptive analysis approach by applying the deductive method, namely conclude a general discussion into a specific statement. Of course, the restorative justice house guarantees legal certainty and is an adequate facility in its implementation, moreover the Attorney General's Office has also formed a Quick Response Task Force in maximizing the role of the restorative justice house, by providing input on cases that deserve to be resolved through restorative justice, one of which is the crime of theft. which is happening.

The progress of digital transformation requires efforts to protect personal data as a guarantee of individual rights to overcome the large number of cases of data leakage and misuse, one of which is population data. The concretization of the government's efforts based on Article 28 G of the 1945 Constitution is realized through providing access to population data to all institutions, both state and private institutions for data verification. In addition, there is an obligation for data user parties to implement a Zero Data Sharing Policy with provisions prohibiting the dissemination or sharing of population data with third parties. However, various basic factors are influenced by the limited aspects of legal protection related to the class of personal data, and the authority between the data owner and the user, which makes it imperative to enact the current regulation on personal data protection. In addition, the establishment of an Independent Surveillance Authority is a must in ensuring the implementation of these regulations, because their duties and authorities are in line with the government's efforts in protecting population data. This study uses a normative legal research method with an approach to legislation and literature study, and uses descriptive analysis in managing qualitative data by applying a deductive method. The results of the study indicate that the need for legal guarantees must be accompanied by an element of optimal supervision through the establishment of an Independent Surveillance Authority in accordance with the standardization of the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR). Its independent position will prevent intervention from various parties for certain interests. Functionally, it is considered appropriate in optimizing the implementation of the Zero Data Sharing Policy through the conception of investigative authority and collective rights as a guarantee of human rights.

No abstract