Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of TIP as salvage chemotherapy for germ cell tumor (GCT) patients with relapsed disease or cisplatin (CDDP)-refractory disease and consolidation chemotherapy for patients who responded unfavorably to first-line chemotherapy.MethodsForty-three patients with advanced GCT were treated with TIP. Eleven with relapsed disease and five with CDDP-refractory disease received TIP as salvage chemotherapy. The remaining 27 received TIP as consolidation chemotherapy following initial induction chemotherapy. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.ResultsIn total, 116 cycles of TIP were administered with a median of three cycles (range 1–4 cycles) per patient. Before TIP, 33 patients showed elevated tumor marker and 23 patients (70 %) achieved marker normalization with the chemotherapy. One of six (17 %) patients with refractory disease and 5 of 10 (50 %) patients with relapsed disease achieved durable complete response (CR) after TIP with or without surgery. Eighteen of 27 (67 %) patients receiving TIP as consolidation chemotherapy achieved durable CR. Five additional patients were given further chemotherapy and achieved durable CR. Grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 91 and 42 % of patients, respectively; all were managed with routine supportive care. Grade 2 and grade 3 sensory neuropathy was observed in 37 and 2 % of patients, respectively.ConclusionsThe TIP was effective for relapsed patients with favorable risk features and selected CDDP-refractory GCT patients. Results of TIP as consolidation for patients with unfavorable response to the initial chemotherapy were also encouraging. The toxicities were mainly myelosuppression and sensory neuropathy.

The present study demonstrated that AKI (CTCAE v4.0) during chemotherapy had a negative impact on both the intensity of subsequent chemotherapy and oncological outcomes.

Objective: The aim of the study is to clarify the clinical effects of first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced urothelial cancer on clinical responses and survival of patients grouped by renal function. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 345 urothelial cancer patients received systemic chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable disease in 17 centers . Results: Two hundred and forty-one patients were treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin/methotrexate, epirubicin and cisplatin (n = 136) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (n = 105) followed by carboplatin-based treatments, non-platinum treatments or other regimens. After 2008, gemcitabine and cisplatin was the most frequently used regimen in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 and in those with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/ min/1.73 m 2 . The gemcitabine and cisplatin patients' complete response rate was 10.5% and their response rate was 52.4%, which was highest among all regimens. Gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated a better 3-year overall survival when the estimated glomerular filtration rate was ≥60 ml/min/ 1.73 m 2 (31.4%), but it tended to be worse when the estimated glomerular filtration rate was <60 ml/ min/1.73 m 2 (14.1%). In the latter cases, the dose reduction rate of gemcitabine and cisplatin was high (43.9%). Among the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , the 1-year overall survival of the patients treated with a reduced dose of gemcitabine and cisplatin was significantly lower than that of those treated with standard-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin (26.2 vs. 60.3%, respectively, P = 0.0108). Conclusions: Gemcitabine and cisplatin provided favorable responses and survival in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 but unsatisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , especially when treated with a reduced dose. Alternative regimens might be optimal rather than reduced-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 .

Objective: There has been no clear evidence supporting similar chemo-responses for upper and lower urothelial carcinomas. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to analyze urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy at 17 centers from 2004 to 2010. A total of 298 patients with either urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (N = 151) or upper tract urothelial carcinoma (N = 147) were included. Differences in tumor location (urothelial carcinoma of the bladder vs. upper tract urothelial carcinoma) were evaluated in relation to the patient backgrounds and clinical responses to systemic chemotherapy. Results: Overall 216 patients were treated with cisplatin-based chemo-regimens (gemcitabine and cisplatin in 92, or methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin/methotrexate, epirubicin and cisplatin in 124). Among 186 initially metastatic patients, the incidences of lung metastasis and liver metastasis were 39.2 and 34.1%, respectively, in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients, and were significantly higher than those with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (22.4% for lung; 8.4% for liver metastasis). Among 112 post-surgical recurrent/metastatic patients, age was significantly higher and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline was significantly lower in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients than those with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. No significant differences were observed in overall clinical response rates for systemic chemotherapy between urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (45.8%) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (38%) in initially metastatic patients or between urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (43.2%) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (44.1%) in post-surgical recurrent/metastatic patients. Tumor location was not independently associated with cancer-specific survival in either initially metastatic or post-surgical recurrent/metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in response rates of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma to systemic chemotherapy, suggesting that a similar chemo-regimen can be applied to metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients regardless of tumor location (upper vs. lower).

The present study is the first to show that an ideal protocol using cernitin pollen extract has the potential to avoid an unnecessary prostate biopsy procedure in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen, possibly caused by inflammation. Additional studies with greater numbers of participants are required to confirm our findings and develop an ideal protocol.