Introduction In the older intensive care unit (ICU) trauma population, it is common to have to make decisions about end-of-life. We sought to demonstrate uncertainty of patients and providers in this area. Methods Our study is a prospective observational study of trauma patients 50 years and older admitted to the ICU. Patients or surrogates completed a survey including questions regarding end-of-life. Team members were surveyed with their expectation for patient outcome and appropriateness of palliative or comfort care. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test were performed. Results 100 patients had data available for analysis. Surveys were completed by the patient for 39 while a surrogate completed the survey for 61 patients. There was a significant increase in uncertainty if a surrogate answered or if there had been no prior discussions about end-of-life. Nurse, resident, and attending predictions about hospital survival were similar with all groups predicting survival in 82%. 6-month survivors were only predicted to be alive 75% of the time. Ideas about comfort care were similar but there was more variation regarding a palliative care consult with nurses saying yes in 27% of surveys while physicians only said yes in 18%. Conclusions The significantly higher rates of uncertainty for both surrogates or in cases where no prior discussion had been had highlight the importance of having more conversations about end-of-life and documentation of advance directives prior to traumatic events. The difference in team member ideas about palliative care demonstrates a need for improved team communication.

Introduction There is currently no standard definition of sarcopenia, which has often been associated with frailty. A commonly cited surrogate measure of sarcopenia is psoas muscle size. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess medical providers’ capabilities to identify frail elderly trauma patients and consequent impact on outcomes after intensive care unit admission. Methods Trauma intensive care unit patients over the age of 50 were enrolled. A preadmission functional status questionnaire was completed on admission. Attendings, residents, and nurses, blinded to their patient’s sarcopenic status, completed surveys regarding 6-month prognosis. Chart review included cross-sectional psoas area measurements on computerized tomography scan. Finally, patients received phone calls 3 and 6 months after admission to determine overall health and functional status. Results Seventy-six participants had an average age of 70 years and a corrected psoas area of 383 ± 101 mm2/m2. Injury Severity Score distribution (17.2 ± 8.9) was similar for both groups. Patients also had similar preinjury activities of daily living. Both groups had similar hospital courses. While sarcopenic patients were less likely to be predicted to survive to 6 months (60% vs. 76%, P = 0.017), their actual 6-month mortality was similar (22% vs. 21%, P = 0.915). Conclusion Despite similar objective measures of preadmission health and trauma injury severity, medical providers were able to recognize frail patients and predicted they would have worse outcomes. Interestingly, sarcopenic patients had similar outcomes to the control group. Additional studies are needed to further delineate factors influencing provider insight into functional reserves of elderly trauma patients.

No abstract

No abstract