Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an important step in the treatment of various types of breast cancer by downsizing the tumor to make it operable. Determining disease extent after NAC is essential for accurate surgical planning. MRI has been the gold standard for detecting tumors that are usually difficult to detect on ultrasound or mammography. However, the use of MRI after NAC is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of post-NAC MRI in the detection of residual disease preoperatively and to investigate the factors associated with pathological complete response (pCR). Methodology This retrospective review study was approved by the institutional review board with waiving of the informed consent. A total of 90 charts between January 2016 and January 2019 were reviewed. Baseline lesion size was measured as the maximal diameter in a single dimension by pretreatment MRI. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting residual disease, we used two different definitions of pCR in the breast. The first is the resolution of both invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ. The second is the resolution of the invasive disease only. As a secondary objective of the study, we assessed the association between different patients’ characteristics and both MRI and pathologic response using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results A total of 52 women (mean age: 47.4 years; range: 28-74) with 56 breast masses were eligible for the study. Complete MRI response was noted in 22 (39%) masses. pCR was achieved in 14 (25%) and 25 (44.6%) masses using the first and second pCR definitions, respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy of MRI for detecting residual disease were 50% and 75%, respectively, using the first pCR definition. With the second pCR definition, NPV and accuracy were 77.3% and 76.8%, respectively. Positive axillary lymph nodes were the only significant factor associated with incomplete MRI and pathological responses. Conclusions MRI NPV for residual disease was higher with the second pCR definition; however, overall accuracy was not different. MRI accuracy in detecting residual disease after NAC is not adequate to replace pathological assessment.
Background: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an inherited connective tissue disorder. Pectus excavatum (PEX) is common in MFS. The purpose was to evaluate the association of PEX with cardiovascular manifestations of MFS, biventricular size and function. Methods: MFS adults undergoing cardiac MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria were incomplete cardiac MRI, significant artifacts, co-existent ischaemic or congenital heart disease. Haller Index (HI) ≥3.25 classified patients as PEX positive (PEX+) and PEX negative (PEX−). Cardiac MRI analysis included assessment of mitral valve prolapse (MVP), mitral annular disjunction (MAD), biventricular volumetry and aortic dimensions. Results: 212 MFS patients were included, 76 PEX+ and 136 PEX− (HI 8.3 ± 15.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.5, P < .001). PEX+ were younger (33.4 ± 12.0 vs 38.1 ± 14.3 years, P = .02) and similar in sex distribution (55% vs 63% male, P = .26) compared to PEX−. MVP and MAD were more frequent in PEX+ vs PEX− (43/76 [57%] vs 37/136 [27%], P < .001; 44/76 [58%] vs 50/136[37%], P = .003, respectively). PEX+ had higher right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (RVEDVi 92 ± 17mL/m2 vs 84 ± 22mL/m2, P = .04; RVESVi 44 ± 10 mL/m2 vs 39 ± 14 mL/m2, P = .02), lower RV ejection fraction (RVEF 52 ± 5% vs 55 ± 6%, P = .01) compared to PEX−. Left ventricular (LV) volumes, LVEF and aortic dimensions were similar. Conclusion: MFS adults with PEX have higher frequency of cardiac manifestations including MV abnormalities, increased RV volumes and lower RVEF compared to those without PEX. Awareness of this association is important for all radiologists who interpret aortic CT or MRI, where HI can be easily measured. PEX in MFS may suggest more severe disease expression necessitating careful screening for MV abnormalities and outcomes surveillance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.