BACKGROUND Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and diseases caused by HPV are common in boys and men. We report on the safety of a quadrivalent vaccine (active against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18) and on its efficacy in preventing the development of external genital lesions and anogenital HPV infection in boys and men. METHODS We enrolled 4065 healthy boys and men 16 to 26 years of age, from 18 countries in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. The primary efficacy objective was to show that the quadrivalent HPV vaccine reduced the incidence of external genital lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. Efficacy analyses were conducted in a per-protocol population, in which subjects received all three vaccinations and were negative for relevant HPV types at enrollment, and in an intention-to-treat population, in which subjects received vaccine or placebo, regardless of baseline HPV status. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat population, 36 external genital lesions were seen in the vaccine group as compared with 89 in the placebo group, for an observed efficacy of 60.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8 to 73.8); the efficacy was 65.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 78.6) for lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. In the per-protocol population, efficacy against lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was 90.4% (95% CI, 69.2 to 98.1). Efficacy with respect to persistent infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 and detection of related DNA at any time was 47.8% (95% CI, 36.0 to 57.6) and 27.1% (95% CI, 16.6 to 36.3), respectively, in the intention-to-treat population and 85.6% (97.5% CI, 73.4 to 92.9) and 44.7% (95% CI, 31.5 to 55.6) in the per-protocol population. Injection-site pain was significantly more frequent among subjects receiving quadrivalent HPV vaccine than among those receiving placebo (57% vs. 51%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Quadrivalent HPV vaccine prevents infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, and 18 and the development of related external genital lesions in males 16 to 26 years of age. (Funded by Merck and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.)

BACKGROUNDClostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Recurrences are common after antibiotic therapy. Actoxumab and bezlotoxumab are human monoclonal antibodies against C. difficile toxins A and B, respectively. METHODSWe conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials, MODIFY I and MODIFY II, involving 2655 adults receiving oral standard-of-care antibiotics for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection. Participants received an infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight), actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram each), or placebo; actoxumab alone (10 mg per kilogram) was given in MODIFY I but discontinued after a planned interim analysis. The primary end point was recurrent infection (new episode after initial clinical cure) within 12 weeks after infusion in the modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTSIn both trials, the rate of recurrent C. difficile infection was significantly lower with bezlotoxumab alone than with placebo (MODIFY I In prespecified subgroup analyses (combined data set), rates of recurrent infection were lower in both groups that received bezlotoxumab than in the placebo group in subpopulations at high risk for recurrent infection or for an adverse outcome. The rates of initial clinical cure were 80% with bezlotoxumab alone, 73% with actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab, and 80% with placebo; the rates of sustained cure (initial clinical cure without recurrent infection in 12 weeks) were 64%, 58%, and 54%, respectively. The rates of adverse events were similar among these groups; the most common events were diarrhea and nausea.: CONCLUSIONSAmong participants receiving antibiotic treatment for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection, bezlotoxumab was associated with a substantially lower rate of recurrent infection than placebo and had a safety profile similar to that of placebo. The addition of actoxumab did not improve efficacy. 306T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dicine I n high-income countries, Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. 1,2 After completing initial antibiotic therapy, up to 35% of patients have recurrent C. difficile infection, 3,4 which is more difficult to treat and is associated with more hospitalizations, more severe outcomes, and higher costs than the first infection and a 50 to 60% chance of repeat recurrent infections. 5,6 Currently, no therapy has been approved to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection.Passive or active immunization against C. difficile toxins A and B is protective in animals that are challenged with toxigenic C. difficile, 7-9 which underscores the key importance of the toxins in causing the symptoms of C. difficile infection. The relative biologic importance of toxins A and B in C. difficile infection is controversial, but it may be host species-dependent. 10-12 Neutralization of both toxins appears to be necessary for maximal protection in rodents, but neutralization of toxin...

Use of the qHPV vaccine reduced the rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, including of grade 2 or 3, among men who have sex with men. The vaccine had a favorable safety profile and may help to reduce the risk of anal cancer. (Funded by Merck and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.).

NFECTIONS WITH STAPHYLOCOCCUS aureus following median sternotomy cause substantial morbidity and mortality. 1-3 A safe vaccine that provides protection against a majority of S aureus strains during the postoperative period would address an important unmet medical need. 4,5 A novel vaccine candidate (V710; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp) containing the highly conserved S aureus 0657nI iron surface determinant B (IsdB) was protective in animal challenge models 6-8 and immunogenic within 14 days after a single dose of either an adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted formulation in healthy volunteers. 9,10 Antibody response to V710 was similar in younger and older partici-For editorial comment see p 1408.

Since 1990, the reported incidence of pertussis has increased in the United States with peaks occurring every 3-4 years. On the basis of analysis of pertussis cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the incidence remained stable among children aged younger than 5 years, most of whom were protected by vaccination. In contrast to 1990-1993, during 1994-1996, the average incidence among persons aged 5-9 years, 10-19 years, and 20 years or older increased 40%, 106%, and 93%, respectively. Since 1990, 14 states reported pertussis incidences of > or =2 cases per 100,000 population during at least 4 years between 1990 and 1996; seven of these states also reported that a high proportion of cases occurred in persons aged 10 years or older. Analysis of national data on pertussis did not provide sufficient information to fully elucidate the relative importance of multiple possible explanations for the increase in the incidence of pertussis in adolescents and adults. Improvement in diagnosis and reporting of pertussis in this age group, particularly in some states, is an important factor contributing to the overall increase.