FCRs were the most-common rounding category among respondents. FCRs were not associated with a self-reported increase in rounding duration. Successful FCR implementation may require educating staff members and trainees about FCR benefits and addressing FCR barriers.

discuss management strategies. This article summarizes the recommendations of the consensus panel for physicians. The recommendations for nurses will be published separately. Definition and Scope of the ProblemEarly identification of DVA is the first step in optimizing patient care. The consensus panel described DVA as a clinical condition in which multiple attempts and/or special interventions are anticipated or required to achieve and maintain peripheral venous access. Special interventions are defined as the use of any technique or hospital resource with the potential to improve peripheral IV insertion success rates. These include traditional methods of enhancing the visibility and palpability of peripheral veins (eg, warming the catheter site to induce vasodilation) [10][11][12] ; advanced visualization technologies such as ultrasound, transillumination, and nearinfrared lighting 2,[13][14][15] ; and enlisting designated IV specialists and/or hospital staff with extensive experience in starting pediatric IVs.16 Some children may need more invasive interventions such as intraosseous (IO) infusion, a peripherally inserted central catheter, or a central venous catheter (CVC) to achieve parenteral access.There is a dearth of clinical evidence on the incidence of DVA in pediatric patients. Studies of IV insertion success rates indicate that 5% to 33% of children require more than 2 needle sticks to achieve IV access. [1][2][3][4] Even when interventions such as transillumination and ultrasound are used, up to 15% of children still require more than 2 attempts to establish venous access.2 A recent prospective analysis of 593 insertion attempts in centers with pediatric hospitalist services showed that successful placement E stablishing peripheral intravenous (IV) access in pediatric patients can be challenging. Clinical studies show that only 53% to 76% of children are successfully cannulated on the first attempt.1-4 Multiple failed attempts are painful and upsetting for the child and distressing for family members and caregivers, 5-9 yet there are no guidelines or consensus statements on the recognition and management of this problem.In January 2008, a panel of physicians and nurses specializing in emergency medicine, anesthesia, critical care, and hospital medicine convened to discuss peripheral difficult venous access (DVA) in children. Daniel Rauch, MD, FAAP, and Laura L. Kuensting, MSN(R), RN, CPNP, cochaired the roundtable discussion, which was made possible by a grant from Baxter Healthcare, Inc. The main objectives of the meeting were to estimate the frequency of DVA in pediatric patients; describe its clinical and emotional impact on the patient, the patient's family, and clinicians; develop terminology that accurately describes the condition; review the factors that help identify children with DVA; and

OBJECTIVES:We sought to evaluate trends in pediatric inpatient unit capacity and access and to measure pediatric inpatient unit closures across the United States. METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of 4720 US hospitals using the 2008-2018 American Hospital Association survey. We used linear regression to describe trends in pediatric inpatient unit and PICU capacity. We compared trends in pediatric inpatient days and bed counts by state. We examined changes in access to care by calculating distance to the nearest pediatric inpatient services by census block group. We analyzed hospital characteristics associated with pediatric inpatient unit closure in a survival model. RESULTS: Pediatric inpatient units decreased by 19.1% (34 units per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 31 to 37), and pediatric inpatient unit beds decreased by 11.8% (407 beds per year; 95% CI 347 to 468). PICU beds increased by 16.0% (66.9 beds per year; 95% CI 53 to 81), primarily at children's hospitals. Rural areas experienced steeper proportional declines in pediatric inpatient unit beds (À26.1% vs À10.0%). Most states experienced decreases in both pediatric inpatient unit beds (median state À18.5%) and pediatric inpatient days (median state À10.0%). Nearly one-quarter of US children experienced an increase in distance to their nearest pediatric inpatient unit. Low-volume pediatric units and those without an associated PICU were at highest risk of closing.CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric inpatient unit capacity is decreasing in the United States. Access to inpatient care is declining for many children, particularly those in rural areas. PICU beds are increasing, primarily at large children's hospitals. Policy and surge planning improvements may be needed to mitigate the effects of these changes.

Pediatricians render care in an increasingly complex environment, which results in multiple opportunities to cause unintended harm. National awareness of patient safety risks has grown since the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) published its report "To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System" in 1999. Patients and society as a whole continue to challenge health care providers to examine their practices and implement safety solutions. The depth and breadth of harm incurred by the practice of medicine is still being defined as reports continue to reveal a variety of avoidable errors, from those that involve specific high-risk medications to those that are more generalizable, such as patient misidentification and diagnostic error. Pediatric health care providers in all practice environments benefit from having a working knowledge of patient safety language. Pediatric providers should serve as advocates for best practices and policies with the goal of attending to risks that are unique to children, identifying and supporting a culture of safety, and leading efforts to eliminate avoidable harm in any setting in which medical care is rendered to children. In this Policy Statement, we provide an update to the 2011 Policy Statement "Principles of Pediatric Patient Safety: Reducing Harm Due to Medical Care." BACKGROUND INFORMATION Patient safety is defined as the prevention of harm to patients. 1 Although patient safety is only 1 of the 6 domains of quality of care defined by the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine [IOM]), 2 it is undoubtedly one of the most important. There are real and growing concerns regarding pediatric errors and harms reported related to specific populations, such as with the use of temporary names in newborn care, 3 as well as issues spanning all populations, such as diagnostic errors in ambulatory and hospital settings 4 and information technology errors in prescribing. 5 Pediatricians in all practice settings can help champion the