The nuclear lamina is a critical structural domain for the maintenance of genomic stability and whole-cell mechanics. Mutations in the LMNA gene, which encodes nuclear A-type lamins lead to the disruption of these key cellular functions, resulting in a number of devastating diseases known as laminopathies. Cardiomyopathy is a common laminopathy and is highly penetrant with poor prognosis. To date, cell mechanical instability and dysregulation of gene expression have been proposed as the main mechanisms driving cardiac dysfunction, and indeed discoveries in these areas have provided some promising leads in terms of therapeutics. However, important questions remain unanswered regarding the role of lamin A dysfunction in the heart, including a potential role for the toxicity of lamin A precursors in LMNA cardiomyopathy, which has yet to be rigorously investigated.

No abstract

Regulation of the genome is viewed through the prism of gene expression, DNA replication and DNA repair as controlled through transcription, chromatin compartmentalisation and recruitment of repair factors by enzymes such as DNA polymerases, ligases, acetylases, methylases and cyclin-dependent kinases. However, recent advances in the field of muscle cell physiology have also shown a compelling role for ‘outside-in’ biophysical control of genomic material through mechanotransduction. The crucial hub that transduces these biophysical signals is called the Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC). This complex is embedded across the nuclear envelope, which separates the nucleus from the cytoplasm. How the LINC complex operates to mechanically regulate the many functions of DNA is becoming increasingly clear, and recent advances have provided exciting insight into how this occurs in cells from mechanically activated tissues such as skeletal and cardiac muscle. Nevertheless, there are still some notable shortcomings in our understanding of these processes and resolving these will likely help us understand how muscle diseases manifest at the level of the genome.

SummaryRnd proteins are atypical Rho family proteins that do not hydrolyse GTP and are instead regulated by expression levels and post-translational modifications. Rnd1 and Rnd3/RhoE induce loss of actin stress fibres and cell rounding in multiple cell types, whereas responses to Rnd2 are more variable. Here we report the responses of endothelial cells to Rnd proteins. Rnd3 induces a very transient decrease in stress fibres but subsequently stimulates a strong increase in stress fibres, in contrast to the reduction observed in other cell types. Rnd2 also increases stress fibres whereas Rnd1 induces a loss of stress fibres and weakening of cell–cell junctions. Rnd3 does not act through any of its known signalling partners and does not need to associate with membranes to increase stress fibres. Instead, it acts by increasing RhoB expression, which is then required for Rnd3-induced stress fibre assembly. Rnd2 also increases RhoB levels. These data indicate that the cytoskeletal response to Rnd3 expression is dependent on cell type and context, and identify regulation of RhoB as a new mechanism for Rnd proteins to affect the actin cytoskeleton.