Despite advances in molecular systematics, the taxonomy of tardigrades still depends largely on morphological and morphometric traits. The fact that the variability of any biological trait is determined by the interaction between genetics and environment prompts a very fundamental question: is it possible for tardigrades of the same genotype, but originating from various habitats that differ in environmental conditions, to have phenotypes so different that they would be erroneously classified as different species taxa by means of classical taxonomy? Here, we present the results of a broad and fully controlled laboratory experiment in which we investigated the phenotypic plasticity of a number of traits that are traditionally considered to be taxonomically important. In order to achieve this, we have cultured six tardigrade species belonging to four eutardigrade families (Milnesiidae, Hypsibiidae, Isohypsibiidae, and Macrobiotidae) under five experimental regimes, reflecting key environmental factors that are likely to vary in natural habitats (i.e. temperature and food availability). We then measured a number of key taxonomic traits and compared their dimensions between the treatments. Over two years of experimentation we have obtained more than 28 000 morphometric measurements for over 2300 individuals. Such an extensive data set allowed us to test some of the fundamental assumptions of classic tardigrade taxonomy. We found that in the five parachelan species analysed, the great majority of both absolute and relative traits differed significantly between the treatments, whereas there were no significant differences in the apochelan species. Overall, tardigrades grew largest under the low-temperature treatment, whereas the smallest specimens were observed under high-temperature and low-food regimes. However, the prevalent statistical significance resulted mainly from the considerable statistical power of our analyses, and not from effect sizes, which varied mostly between low and moderate. In other words, the differences, although consistent, were minor in terms of taxonomical significance, and probably would not be considered by classic taxonomists as sufficient to designate animals from different treatments as separate taxa.
Differences in thermal regimes are of paramount importance in insect development. However, experiments that examine trait development under constant temperature conditions may yield less evolutionarily relevant results than those that take naturally occurring temperature fluctuations into account. We investigated the effect of different temperature regimes (constant 30 °C, constant 35 °C, fluctuating with a daily mean of 30 °C, or fluctuating with a daily mean of 35 °C) on sex-specific development time and body mass in Tribolium castaneum. Using a half-sib breeding design, we also examined whether there is any evidence for genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI) for the studied traits. In response to fluctuating temperature regimes, beetles demonstrated reaction norm patterns in which thermal fluctuations influenced traits negatively above the species’ thermal optimum but had little to no effect close to the thermal optimum. Estimated heritabilities of development time were in general low and non-significant. In case of body mass of pupae and adults, despite significant genetic variance, we did not find any GEI due to crossing of reaction norms, both between temperatures and between variability treatments. We have observed a weak tendency towards higher heritabilities of adult and pupa body mass in optimal fluctuating thermal conditions. Thus, we have not found any biasing effect of stable thermal conditions as compared to fluctuating temperatures on the breeding values of heritable body-size traits. Contrary to this we have observed a strong population-wide effect of thermal fluctuations, indicated by the significant temperature-fluctuations interaction in both adult and pupa mass.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11692-016-9375-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
There is a trade-off between reproductive effort and adult longevity, and when resource allocation is taken into account, it is especially pronounced in species that have aphagous adult forms. This trade-off may be further complicated by environmental factors such as nutrient availability during larval development and by the other sex, which influences the costs of reproduction due to the presentation of nuptial gifts. Here, we examined the influence of larval nutrient quantity on the sex-specific longevity costs of reproduction in the gift-giving seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. We found no indication that differences in the nutrient quality of larger and smaller host seeds influence survival in virgin and reproducing individuals or nuptial gift size in reproducing individuals. However, in the case of reproducing individuals, the effect of seed size on survival was statistically marginal. Therefore, we advise taking this into account when investigating reproductive efforts in this species. We have also observed interesting interactions between male and female reproductive costs. While females had generally higher mortality than males, nuptial gifts resulted in lowered female mortality and increased male mortality. Additionally, we found a possibly non-linear relationship between nuptial gift size and the offspring production rate of female recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.