The purpose of this article is to address current issues of doctrinal and legal security of economic security of the state with the actualisation of issues concerning the relationship between the concepts of “economic security” and “economic sovereignty” in their relationship and mutual understanding. The authors pay attention to the analysis of existing in the national legal doctrines of individual countries scientific approaches to the definition of “economic sovereignty”, clarify its main features, analyse the scientific approaches of domestic and foreign researchers to define the concept of “economic security” and on this basis own vision of the instrumental content of these definitions. It is argued that the concept of “economic sovereignty” is primary in relation to the concept of “economic security”. The article examines the national systems (models) of economic security of the state, including, in particular, American, Japanese, Chinese, models of institutional entities (in particular, the EU), models typical of countries with economies in transition. The authors found that Ukraine is characterised by a system (model) of economic security of countries with economies in transition, which is fragmented and inconsistent in its construction, which ultimately affects the state of economic security of the state as a whole. It was found that the main goal of Ukraine at this stage of its development in the context of building a national model of economic security is to create an effective system of means to overcome or minimise existing or potential threats, especially in the context of globalisation of trade and economic relations. The paper emphasises the need to borrow positive foreign experience of legal support of relations for the creation and implementation of national systems of economic security of the state to gradually transform Ukraine into an important participant in the processes of international economic security

This article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the legislation of Ukraine and the EU in the field of legal regulation of waste management. The requirements for approximation of the legislation of Ukraine and the EU in the context of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand, are considered. This process is detailed, with the establishment of specific deadlines for the implementation of certain provisions of EU law in Ukrainian law, in Annex XXX to the Association Agreement. Approaches to the establishment of the concept of «waste» in national legislation are noted, it is emphasized that various regulations provide a different definition of this concept and established as defined by EU legislation, a key component of which is the concept of disposal, which aims to solve the problem of homelessness. waste. A number of solutions regulating the classification of waste in the European Union are considered, in particular the existence of the so-called List of waste. Emphasis is placed on the imperfection of the waste classification process in Ukraine, as the Waste Classifier DK 005- 96 does not establish the degree of harmful effects of waste on the environment. The requirements set out in the main Directives governing waste management have been studied. The principles of waste management are considered, in particular, which is enshrined in Directive 75/442/EEC. The National Strategy for Waste Management in Ukraine until 2030 is studied, which identifies the main directions of state regulation in the field of waste management, taking into account European approaches, which are based on key Directives in this area. The strategy stipulates that the normative documents that will be developed and adopted for its implementation should be based exclusively on the principles and provisions of the relevant acts of European legislation.

No abstract

The article reveals the basic concepts and opinions of scientists about the legal nature of the European Union, in particular, such as: a confederation – a temporary union of independent states, a supranational (superstate) integration formation endowed with power, an interstate association, which combines the features of an international intergovernmental organization and a state-like formation, and some others opinions. However, the author determines that she is addicted to the theory that the European Union can be recognized as a federation. Then the author examines the structure of the European Union and examines it from the side of the main features of a federal state, for instance: the existence of legal acts that form a «constitution», which by their nature are recognized above the legislation of each specific member state (it also refers to a two-level system of legislation), the presence of a two- level system of governments, the presence of a two-level judicial system, the presence of a representative body of government directly elected by society, the presence of its own citizens and territory, the existence of its own budget system and taxation of citizens, as well as the existence of certain police and law enforcement agencies. The author compares the European Union with certain modern countries to confirm his own thoughts about its similarities. Further, the author analyzes views of certain scientists, who claims that the European Union is not a federation, as an example, the absence of a unified armed forces, or the fact that each participating state is a sovereign state, and gives his own reasoning on these issues. Then the author gives his own opinion about why the European Union cannot be decisively recognized as a federation, in particular, relying on the fact that a federation is, first of all, an independent state. At the end of the article, the author summarizes and provides a conclusion throughout the research, paying attention to the main points of the entire article.

The article is devoted to the issue of settling relations on the implementation of cyber security policy in the European Union and Ukraine. The leading role of the EU in the process of determining the key directions of cyber policy in the EU member states, as well as the steps of Ukraine in this area in the course of European integration reforms are studied. The authors analyze the system of normative acts of EU institutions in the field of cybersecurity, including, in particular, strategic documents containing general guidelines for policy implementation, as well as binding regulations and directives, the provisions of which specify mechanisms for implementing cyber policy in EU member states. The main normative documents of the EU in the field of cyber security of both states and private consumers of digital services on the Internet have been identified. The formation of a secure digital market in the EU in the context of the implementation of certification schemes for digital products and services, as well as the regulatory and institutional framework for combating fraud on the Internet are analyzed. The main opportunities, means of implementation and EU institutions responsible for the functioning of the secure European cyberspace, in particular the EU Cyber Security Agency (ENISA), are explored. In the context of the adoption of the new EU Cyber Security Strategy for the next 10 years, future EU steps in the field of cyber security are identified, such as accelerating the implementation of key Internet security standards, application and rapid completion of 5G technologies, cyber intelligence, etc. The authors analyze the system of legal acts of Ukraine in the field of national cybersecurity. The shortcomings of the regulatory and legal regulation of cybersecurity and the implementation of regulations of national legislation are identified. In addition, the authors note the positive developments in the implementation of cyber policy in Ukraine, including the development of the Cyber Security Strategy of Ukraine for 2021-2025.