The article is devoted to the issue of settling relations on the implementation of cyber security policy in the European Union and Ukraine. The leading role of the EU in the process of determining the key directions of cyber policy in the EU member states, as well as the steps of Ukraine in this area in the course of European integration reforms are studied. The authors analyze the system of normative acts of EU institutions in the field of cybersecurity, including, in particular, strategic documents containing general guidelines for policy implementation, as well as binding regulations and directives, the provisions of which specify mechanisms for implementing cyber policy in EU member states. The main normative documents of the EU in the field of cyber security of both states and private consumers of digital services on the Internet have been identified. The formation of a secure digital market in the EU in the context of the implementation of certification schemes for digital products and services, as well as the regulatory and institutional framework for combating fraud on the Internet are analyzed. The main opportunities, means of implementation and EU institutions responsible for the functioning of the secure European cyberspace, in particular the EU Cyber Security Agency (ENISA), are explored. In the context of the adoption of the new EU Cyber Security Strategy for the next 10 years, future EU steps in the field of cyber security are identified, such as accelerating the implementation of key Internet security standards, application and rapid completion of 5G technologies, cyber intelligence, etc. The authors analyze the system of legal acts of Ukraine in the field of national cybersecurity. The shortcomings of the regulatory and legal regulation of cybersecurity and the implementation of regulations of national legislation are identified. In addition, the authors note the positive developments in the implementation of cyber policy in Ukraine, including the development of the Cyber Security Strategy of Ukraine for 2021-2025.

The article is devoted to the problem of international legal regulation of returning the cultural assets to the country of origin. The authors analyze the stages of the institution for the protection of cultural values development at the national and international levels. The article examines the system of international treaties that constitute the legislative framework of interstate cooperation in the field of returning cultural assets, the role of the UN, UNESCO and other international organizations in creating effective mechanisms for resolving disputes around returning cultural heritage items. The authors pay special attention to the case of Ukraine's claim to the University of Amsterdam on their turn of museum exhibits of the Scythian Gold exhibition, which was organized in the Netherlands under an agreement between the Ukrainian side and the Allard Pearson Museum in early 2014. The paper analyzes the acts of international organizations and national legislation of Ukraine on the consequences of the occupation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation, and analyzes in detail the provisions of the loan agreement, which served as a basis for demonstrating the assets of Ukrainian museums at an exhibition in the Netherlands. The authors critically analyze the arguments of the Crimean museums located on the territory uncontrolled by Ukraine, about having "the right of operational management" for the exported exhibits and provide convincing evidence confirming the ownership of Ukraine for all the temporarily exported museum values. Based on the analysis carried out, the authors come to the conclusion that the international standards for the protection of cultural assets and effective mechanisms for their return to their rightful owners have been developed by the joint efforts of the international community in the twentieth century. The current provisions of international public law and the national legislation of Ukraine, chosen as a result of conflict of legal regulation, give solid grounds to assert that Ukraine is the rightful owner of all museum assets of the exhibition "Scythian gold".