Morphine-induced glial proinflammatory responses have been documented to contribute to tolerance to opioid analgesia. Here, we examined whether drugs previously shown to suppress glial proinflammatory responses can alter other clinically relevant opioid effects; namely, withdrawal or acute analgesia. AV411 (ibudilast) and minocycline, drugs with distinct mechanisms of action that result in attenuation of glial proinflammatory responses, each reduced naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Analysis of brain nuclei associated with opioid withdrawal revealed that morphine altered expression of glial activation markers, cytokines, chemokines, and a neurotrophic factor. AV411 attenuated many of these morphine-induced effects. AV411 also protected against spontaneous withdrawal-induced hyperactivity and weight loss recorded across a 12-day timecourse. Notably, in the spontaneous withdrawal study, AV411 treatment was delayed relative to the start of the morphine regimen so to also test whether AV411 could still be effective in the face of established morphine dependence, which it was. AV411 did not simply attenuate all opioid effects, as co-administering AV411 with morphine or oxycodone caused 3-to-5-fold increases in acute analgesic potency, as revealed by leftward shifts in the analgesic dose response curves. Timecourse analyses revealed that plasma morphine levels were not altered by AV411, suggestive that potentiated analgesia was not simply due to prolongation of morphine exposure or increased plasma concentrations. These data support and extend similar potentiation of acute opioid analgesia by minocycline, again providing converging lines of evidence of glial involvement. Hence, suppression of glial proinflammatory responses can significantly reduce opioid withdrawal, whilst improving analgesia.
Joint manipulation has long been used for pain relief. However, the underlying mechanisms for manipulation-related pain relief remain largely unexplored. The purpose of the current study was to determine which spinal neurotransmitter receptors mediate manipulation-induced antihyperalgesia. Rats were injected with capsaicin (50 microl, 0.2%) into one ankle joint and mechanical withdrawal threshold measured before and after injection. The mechanical withdrawal threshold decreases 2 h after capsaicin injection. Two hours after capsaicin injection, the following drugs were administered intrathecally: bicuculline, blocks gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors; naloxone, blocks opioid receptors; yohimbine blocks, alpha2-adrenergic receptors; and methysergide, blocks 5-HT(1/2) receptors. In addition, NAN-190, ketanserin, and MDL-72222 were administered to selectively block 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT3 receptors, respectively. Knee joint manipulation was performed 15 min after administration of drug. The knee joint was flexed and extended to end range of extension while the tibia was simultaneously translated in an anterior to posterior direction. The treatment group received three applications of manipulation, each 3 min in duration separated by 1 min of rest. Knee joint manipulation after capsaicin injection into the ankle joint significantly increases the mechanical withdrawal threshold for 45 min after treatment. Spinal blockade of 5-HT(1/2) receptors with methysergide prevented, while blockade of alpha2-adrenergic receptors attenuated, the manipulation-induced antihyperalgesia. NAN-190 also blocked manipulation-induced antihyperalgesia suggesting that effects of methysergide are mediated by 5-HT1A receptor blockade. However, spinal blockade of opioid or GABAA receptors had no effect on manipulation induced-antihyperalgesia. Thus, the antihyperalgesia produced by joint manipulation appears to involve descending inhibitory mechanisms that utilize serotonin and noradrenaline.
Two unilateral injections of pH 4.0 saline into the gastrocnemius muscle result in a bilateral decrease in mechanical withdrawal threshold after the second injection. This decrease is significant by 4h and lasts through 1 week. The purpose of this study was to characterize the involvement of both N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA glutamate receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn in the development and maintenance of mechanical hyperalgesia from repeated intramuscular injections of acidic saline. 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5) (2-20 nmol, 10 microl, pH 7) or 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-nitro-2,3-dioxo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX) (1-10 nmol, 10 microl, pH 8-9) was administered intrathecally to the lumbar spinal cord to block NMDA and non-NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors in the dorsal horn, respectively. Drugs were administered at one of three different time points: (1) prior to the first intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline on Day 0, (2) prior to the second intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline on Day 5, and (3) 1 week after the second injection. Mechanical withdrawal thresholds were measured with von Frey filaments before, 4h, and 24h after injection 1 and before, 4h, 24h, and 1 week after injection 2. AP5 had no effect on mechanical withdrawal thresholds when administered prior to the first intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline. When AP5 was administered before the second intramuscular injection, the bilateral decrease in mechanical withdrawal thresholds was delayed for up to 24h. Intrathecal administration of AP5 1 week after the second intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline produced a bilateral increase in mechanical withdrawal thresholds. Blockade of non-NMDA glutamate receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn prior to either the first or second intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline had no effect on the development of mechanical hyperalgesia. However, spinal injection of NBQX 1 week after the second intramuscular injection of pH 4.0 saline resulted in an increase in mechanical withdrawal thresholds when compared to vehicle controls. These data suggest that both NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors are involved in the maintenance of chronic, muscle-induced hyperalgesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.