We present estimates of the volumetric storage capacities of currently drained upland depressions and catchment depressional specific storage and runoff storage indices for the Des Moines Lobe of Iowa (DML‐IA) subregion of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America. Storage capacities were determined using hydrologically enforced Light Detection and Ranging‐derived digital elevation models, and a unique geoprocessing algorithm. Depressional specific storage was estimated for each 12‐digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC12) watershed in the region from total catchment‐specific depressional storage volume and catchment area. Runoff storage indices were calculated using catchment depressional specific storage values and estimates of the amount of rainfall likely to fall within each watershed during sub‐annual and 1‐, 2‐, 5‐, and 10‐year 24‐h events. The 173,171 identified drained depressions in the DML‐IA can store up to 903.5 Mm3 of runoff. Most of this capacity is in depressions located in the north of the region. Specific storage varies from nearly 109 mm in the younger landscapes to <10 mm in older more eroded areas. For 95% of the HUC12 watersheds comprising the region, depressional storage will likely be exhausted by rainfall‐derived runoff in excess of a 1‐year 24‐h event. Rainfall amounts greater than a 5‐year 24‐h event will exceed all available depressional storage. Therefore, the capacity of drained depressions in the DML‐IA to mitigate flooding resulting from infrequent, but large, storm events is limited.
Nonpoint-source nitrogen (N) loads in the U.S. Corn Belt are a major concern both for local impacts on receiving waters and for contributing to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Nonpoint-source nutrient loads can be ameliorated by a combination of infield and offsite practices, and wetland restoration is a particularly promising approach for reducing N loads from agricultural drainage. However, there is considerable variability among wetlands, and adequate performance data are available for relatively few systems receiving unregulated nonpoint-source loads. We measured N mass balances of 26 restored wetlands receiving a wide range of unregulated, naturally varying hydraulic and nutrient loads to evaluate the N removal performance of these systems and the effects of major factors controlling their performance. Nitrogen loads were primarily in the form of nitrate, and all of the wetlands were effective in reducing both nitrate and total N loads. Nitrate N and total N removal rates averaged 1,500 and 1,440 kg N ha −1 yr −1 , respectively, with the slightly lower total N removal rates reflecting a small net export of reduced N (averaging 66 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ). Average nitrate and total N removal rates were substantially higher than typically reported for Corn Belt wetlands but comparable with highly loaded systems elsewhere. Nitrate removal efficiency ranged from 9 to 92% and was strongly related to hydraulic loading rate and temperature. Results demonstrate the substantial capacity of wetlands to reduce unregulated and highly variable nonpoint-source N loads over a broad range of weather and loading conditions and provide a reasonable basis for predicting average wetland performance based on hydraulic loading rate, temperature, and nitrate concentration.
Runoff generation within and from watersheds has long been thought to occur continuously and seamlessly across spatial and temporal scales in response to precipitation events. However, results from recent field and modeling studies challenge this traditional viewpoint (see McDonnell et al., 2021; Spence, 2010 and references therein). Instead, it has been proposed that watershed runoff generation across spatial
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.