No abstract

OBJECTIVE -This study evaluated the effects of exenatide, a novel incretin mimetic, in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve glycemic control with metforminsulfonylurea combination therapy. RESULTS -Week 30 A1C changes from baseline (ϮSE) were Ϫ0.8 Ϯ 0.1% (10 g), Ϫ0.6 Ϯ 0.1% (5 g), and ϩ0.2 Ϯ 0.1% (placebo; adjusted P Ͻ 0.0001 vs. placebo), yielding placeboadjusted reductions of Ϫ1.0% (10 g) and Ϫ0.8% (5 g). In the evaluable population, exenatide-treated subjects were more likely to achieve A1C Յ7% than placebo-treated subjects (34% [10 g], 27% [5 g], and 9% [placebo]; P Ͻ 0.0001). Both exenatide arms demonstrated significant weight loss (Ϫ1.6 Ϯ 0.2 kg from baseline each exenatide arm, Ϫ0.9 Ϯ 0.2 kg placebo; P Յ 0.01 vs. placebo). Mild or moderate nausea was the most frequent adverse event. The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was 28% (10 g), 19% (5 g), and 13% (placebo) and appeared lower with MIN than with MAX sulfonylurea treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSCONCLUSIONS -Exenatide significantly reduced A1C in patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve adequate glycemic control with maximally effective doses of combined metformin-sulfonylurea therapy. This improvement in glycemic control was associated with no weight gain and was generally well tolerated.

OBJECTIVE -Published reports suggest that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these previous studies were either retrospective chart reviews or clinical trials not rigorously controlled for concomitant glucoseand lipid-lowering therapies. This study examines the lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We enrolled subjects with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (treated with diet alone or oral monotherapy) and dyslipidemia (not treated with any lipid-lowering agents). After a 4-week placebo washout period, subjects randomly assigned to the pioglitazone arm (n ϭ 400) were treated with 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks followed by 45 mg once daily for an additional 12 weeks, whereas subjects randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (n ϭ 402) were treated with 4 mg once daily followed by 4 mg twice daily for the same intervals.RESULTS -Triglyceride levels were reduced by 51.9 Ϯ 7.8 mg/dl with pioglitazone, but were increased by 13.1 Ϯ 7.8 mg/dl with rosiglitazone (P Ͻ 0.001 between treatments). Additionally, the increase in HDL cholesterol was greater (5.2 Ϯ 0.5 vs. 2.4 Ϯ 0.5 mg/dl; P Ͻ 0.001) and the increase in LDL cholesterol was less (12.3 Ϯ 1.6 vs. 21.3 Ϯ 1.6 mg/dl; P Ͻ 0.001) for pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone, respectively. LDL particle concentration was reduced with pioglitazone and increased with rosiglitazone (P Ͻ 0.001). LDL particle size increased more with pioglitazone (P ϭ 0.005).CONCLUSIONS -Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have significantly different effects on plasma lipids independent of glycemic control or concomitant lipid-lowering or other antihyperglycemic therapy. Pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone is associated with significant improvements in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL particle concentration, and LDL particle size. Diabetes Care 28:1547-1554, 2005T wo core metabolic defects contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes: relative insulin insufficiency and insulin resistance. Approximately 92% of patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrate insulin resistance (1). Even in the absence of overt hyperglycemia, insulin resistance is associated with a cluster of abnormalities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including dyslipidemia, increased expression of inflammatory markers, activation of procoagulants, hemodynamic changes, and endothelial dysfunction (2,3).The dyslipidemia associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes is characterized by elevated triglycerides and decreased HDL cholesterol (4 -6). Although LDL cholesterol may not be elevated in type 2 diabetes, an increase in the proportion of small, dense, and potentially more atherogenic LDL cholesterol particles is observed (7). In addition to LDL cholesterol, elevated triglyceride levels and reduced HDL cholesterol levels are both risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) (8 -11). Compared with nondiabetic individuals, patients with type 2 diabetes have a two-to fourfold high...

No abstract

Aim: Exenatide, an incretin mimetic for the adjunct treatment of type 2 diabetes (DM2), reduced A1C and weight in 30-week placebo-controlled trials. This analysis examined the effects of exenatide on glycaemic control and weight over an 82-week period in patients with DM2 unable to achieve adequate glycaemic control with sulphonylurea (SU) and/or metformin (MET). [À0.9 AE 0.1% (mean AE SE)] was sustained to week 82 (À1.1 AE 0.1%), with 48% of patients achieving A1C 7% at week 82. At week 30, exenatide reduced body weight (a secondary endpoint) from baseline (À2.1 AE 0.2 kg), with progressive reduction at week 82 (À4.4 AE 0.3 kg). Similar results were observed for the intent-to-treat population (n ¼ 551), with reductions in A1C and weight at week 82 of À0.8 AE 0.1% and À3.5 AE 0.2 kg respectively. The 82-week completer cohort showed statistically significant improvement in some cardiovascular risk factors. The most frequent adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate nausea and hypoglycaemia. Conclusion: In summary, 82 weeks of adjunctive exenatide treatment in patients with DM2 treated with SU and/or MET resulted in sustained reduction in A1C and progressive reduction in weight, as well as improvement in some cardiovascular risk factors.