Exploring the limits of the reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion concept in a light-duty diesel engine and the influence of the direct-injected fuel properties. Energy
This work shows the capabilities of E85 fuel to be used as low reactivity fuel in a high compression ratio light-duty diesel engine (17.1:1) running under reactivity controlled compression ignition concept. To do this, experimental steady-state engine maps are obtained in a single-cylinder engine with diesel-E85 fuel combination. The engine mapping was performed following the same procedure used in previous works with other fuel combinations to allow the results comparison. Considering the mechanical and emissions limits imposed during the engine mapping, it was found that with diesel-E85 the combustion concept is limited to the region defined from 2 to 7 bar at 1000 rpm, and from 1.5 to 9 bar indicated mean effective pressure at 3000 rpm. This operating region was satisfied with nitrogen oxides, soot and pressure rise rate levels below 0.4 g/kWh, 0.01 g/kWh and 10 bar/CAD, respectively. The reactivity controlled compression ignition maps with diesel-E85 were obtained taking as reference the total fuel energy used in a previous work to map the engine with diesel-gasoline. The direct comparison of both combustion concepts (diesel-E85 and diesel-gasoline) revealed that E85 allows to extend the engine map around 2 bar indicated mean effective pressure towards the high load region. Moreover, the minimum load achieved at high engine speeds was decreased down to 1.5 indicated mean effective pressure. Finally, the differences in terms of emissions and performance between both reactivity controlled compression ignition concepts are highlighted by doing the difference between the maps of several variables.
HIGHLIGHTSOptoelectronic pyrometer provides similar results compared with a conventional method Lower injection pressure results in higher radiation Higher ambient temperature and higher in-cylinder gas density produce higher radiation Larger lift-off length reduces the soot volume fraction and the spectral intensity An increase on swirl number, load and CA50 provide a lower total radiation Lower values of EGR implies a decreased on radiation intensity
KEYWORDSSoot; in-cylinder heat transfer; radiation; Optical pyrometer;
ABSTRACTThe efficiency and CO 2 are one of the main concerns of automotive manufacturers.There are several strategies under investigation to solve this problem. In the present work, the research effort has been focused on improving knowledge of in-cylinder heat transfer and its impact on engine efficiency. In particular, soot radiation was studied since it can be considered a significant source of the efficiency losses in modern diesel engines. Considering previous studies, the portion of total chemical energy released during combustion lost due to radiation heat transfer varies widely from 0.5 up to 10%, depending on engine parameters and combustion process. Thus, the main objective of this work was to evaluate the amount of energy lost to soot radiation relative to the input fuel chemical energy during the combustion event under different operating conditions in a completely controlled environment provided by an optical engine. Under these simplified conditions, two-color method was applied by using high speed imaging pyrometer with cameras (two dimensional results) and optoelectronic pyrometer (zero dimensional results). Once a detailed comparison between both diagnostics was performed, optoelectronic pyrometer was used to characterize radiant energy losses in a fully instrumented 4-cylinder direct-injection light-duty diesel engine. In particular swirl ratio, EGR and combustion phasing effects on radiation heat transfer were evaluated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.