4E-BP (eIF4E-BP) represses translation initiation by binding to the 5′ cap–binding protein eIF4E and inhibiting its activity. Although 4E-BP has been shown to be important in growth control, stress response, cancer, neuronal activity, and mammalian circadian rhythms, it is not understood how it preferentially represses a subset of mRNAs. We successfully used HyperTRIBE (targets of RNA binding proteins identified by editing) to identify in vivo 4E-BP mRNA targets in both Drosophila and mammals under conditions known to activate 4E-BP. The protein associates with specific mRNAs, and ribosome profiling data show that mTOR inhibition changes the translational efficiency of 4E-BP TRIBE targets more substantially compared to nontargets. In both systems, these targets have specific motifs and are enriched in translation-related pathways, which correlate well with the known activity of 4E-BP and suggest that it modulates the binding specificity of eIF4E and contributes to mTOR translational specificity.

4E-BP (eIF4E-BP) represses translation initiation by binding to the 5'cap-binding protein eIF4E and inhibiting its activity. Although 4E-BP has been shown to be important in growth control, stress response, cancer, neuronal activity and mammalian circadian rhythms, it is not understood how it preferentially represses a subset of mRNAs. We successfully used hyperTRIBE (Targets of RNA-binding proteins identified by editing) to identify in vivo 4E-BP mRNA targets in both Drosophila and mammals under conditions known to activate 4E-BP. The protein associates with specific mRNAs, and ribosome profiling data show that mTOR inhibition changes the translational efficiency of 4E-BP TRIBE targets compared to non-targets.In both systems, these targets have specific motifs and are enriched in translation-related pathways, which correlate well with the known activity of 4E-BP and suggest that it modulates the binding specificity of eIF4E and contributes to mTOR translational specificity.

The 3′ terminal oligo-uridylation, a post-transcriptional mRNA modification, is conserved among eukaryotes and drives mRNA degradation, thereby affecting several key biological processes such as animal development and viral infection. Our TAIL-seq experiment of mouse liver mRNA collected from six zeitgeber times reveals transcripts with rhythmic poly(A) tail lengths and demonstrates that overall 3′ terminal uridylation frequencies at mRNA poly(A) tail very-ends undergo rhythmic change. Consistently, major terminal uridylyl transferases, TUT4 and TUT7, have cycling protein expression in mouse liver corresponding to 3′ terminal uridylation rhythms, indicating that the cycling expression of TUTases correlates with the rhythmic pattern of uridylation. Furthermore, the double knockdown of TUT4 and TUT7 in U2OS cells lengthens the circadian period and decreases the rhythmic amplitude of clock gene expression. Our work thoroughly profiles the dynamic changes in poly(A) tail lengths and terminal modifications and uncovers uridylation as a post-transcriptional modulator in the mammalian circadian clock.