No abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of monitoring variables (X1) and Work Discipline (X2) on employee productivity (Y) at the Planning Department of PT Kideco Jaya Agung, Batu Sopang District. The analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis that is processed with the help of SPSS. From the calculation results, the regression equation Y = 1.049 + 0.531X1 + 0.283X2 is obtained. The magnitude of the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.906. This shows that there is a solid relationship between supervisory variables (X1) and work discipline (X2) on employee productivity (Y), while the coefficient of determination R2 is 0.810. This shows that the supervisory variable (X1) and the work discipline variable (X2) have an effect of 81% on employee productivity (Y). In contrast, the remaining 19% is influenced by other variables not yet included in this study. From the results of the calculated F value of 82.156 > F table at 5% significance level with degrees of freedom (DB) = nk-1, that is 39-2-1 = 36, amounting to 3.26. This means that there is a joint effect between supervision (X1) and work discipline (X2) on employee productivity (Y). Furthermore, the t-test results showed that the supervision variable (X1) had a dominant effect on employee productivity (Y), obtained tcount> t-table (6.644> 2.028) and seen in the Coefficient Table that the supervision variable (X1) was 6.644 greater than the value of work discipline ( X2) of 2,585 (6,644> 2,585).Keywords: Employee Productivity, Supervision, Work Discipline

This study aims to determine the effect of motivation variables (X1) and competence (X2) on employee performance (Y) simultaneously and partially in the Public Relations and Protocol Section of the Paser Regency Regional Secretariat. The analysis method uses multiple linear regression. The population in this study were all employees in the Public Relations and Protocol Section at the Paser Regency Regional Secretariat. The sample of this study was 32 people. Simultaneous testing shows that there is at least one independent variable (X), which affects the dependent variable. Furthermore, partial testing is carried out, which shows the effect of motivation (X1) has a significant effect on employee performance (Y) of 5.440. While the competency variable (X2) does not affect employee performance (Y). The adjusted R square is 0.472; which means that the variation of motivation (X1) and competence (X2) can explain the performance (Y) of 47.2% while the rest is explained by other unknown factors of 52.8%. Based on the results of the analysis, motivation (X1) is a very dominant variable affecting the performance of employees in the Public Relations and Protocol Section at the Paser Regency Regional Secretariat. This causes competence not to have a significant effect on employee performance.Keywords: motivation, competency and employee performance.