This study compared the effects of a grain-based conventional concentrate (GC) and a concentrate based on agro-industrial by-products (BC), fed with grass silage harvested at early (ES) or late (LS) maturity stage, on dairy performance, CH and CO emissions, and metabolic status of dairy cows. Twenty lactating Nordic Red cows averaging 81 d in milk and 31.9 kg of milk/d pre-trial were assigned to a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. Dietary treatments were in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The silages were harvested 2 wk apart from the same primary growth grass ley. The GC was made from oats, barley and wheat, and soybean meal, whereas the BC contained sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, canola meal, distillers dried grains, palm kernel expeller, and molasses. The diets were fed ad libitum as total mixed rations and were formulated from 661 g/kg of silage, 326 g/kg of concentrate, and 13 g/kg of minerals on a dry matter basis. The BC supplied the cows with less energy. Despite this, milk yield and composition were unaffected by concentrate type, except that milk protein was 0.7 g/kg lower in cows fed BC than in those fed GC. These results were accompanied by a 44 g/kg decrease in total-tract digestibility of crude protein and a 54 g/kg increase in neutral detergent fiber digestibility for cows fed BC. Cows fed ES on average consumed 2 kg/d more dry matter and yielded 3.5 kg/d more milk, 149 g/d more protein, and 141 g/d more fat than cows fed LS. There were few interaction effects between concentrate and silage sources on daily intake and dairy performance. However, edible feed conversion ratio (human-edible output in animal/potentially human-edible feed) showed greater improvements with ES than LS when replacing GC with BC. Feeding diets with late-cut silage generally reduced digestibility and energy utilization efficiency, but improved N utilization efficiency. Feeding LS also led to greater CH yield and CH/CO ratio, and higher plasma concentration of nonesterified fatty acids. Plasma parameters reflecting energy metabolism and inflammation were all within the normal ranges, indicating that the cows were in good health during the experiment. In conclusion, a conventional concentrate can be replaced by agro-industrial by-products without compromising production in early lactation dairy cows. However, silage maturity has a stronger effect on the production traits of dairy cows than type of concentrate.

No abstract

A meta‐analysis of feeding trials using grass silages was conducted to predict production responses for dairy cows fed grass silage. They were divided into two subsets: 69 diets from 11 studies were used for comparison of silages made from primary growth and regrowth grass (harvesting subset), and another 157 diets from 24 studies were used for comparison of digestibility influenced by the maturity of grass ensiled (D‐value, digestible organic matter in dry matter) (maturity subset). The minimum prerequisite for an experiment to be included in the data set was that milk production, feed intake, silage characteristics and concentrate ingredients were reported. Both subsets were analysed using the mixed model procedures of SAS. The mean response in dry‐matter intake (DMI) and silage DMI to improved silage D‐value was 0.0175 and 0.0161 kg per unit D‐value (g/kg DM) respectively. The average increase in milk and energy‐corrected milk yield was 0.30 and 0.37 kg per 10‐unit increase in silage D‐value respectively. Milk protein concentration increased, and fat concentration tended to increase with enhanced silage D‐value. Each 10‐unit increase in D‐value reduced milk yield by 0.092 kg at a given dietary metabolizable energy intake (MEI), suggesting that the ME concentration of high D‐value silages was overestimated. Cows fed regrowth silage produced 0.55 kg/day more energy‐corrected milk than those fed primary growth silage at a given dietary MEI. The prediction models can be used to improve ration formulation systems or incorporated into economic models for optimizing milk production in various farming systems.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of feeding lactating dairy cows with regrowth silages from different 2-and 3-cut harvesting systems on milk production, efficiency of N, and energy utilization. Thirty Nordic Red cows were offered 5 experimental diets containing regrowth silages, crimped barley, and canola meal in replicated incomplete 5 × 4 Latin squares with four 21-d periods consisting of 14 d of feed adaptation and 7 d of sampling. Four second-cut silage diets were examined in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, enabling evaluation of effect of harvest time of the early or late first cut on second-cut silages, short or long regrowth interval within second cut, and their interaction on dairy cow performance. The third-cut silage diet harvested from early first cut and short regrowth interval of second-cut ley was compared with the second-cut silage diets to evaluate the difference in dairy cow performance between second-and third-cut silages. Postponing the first cut and extending the regrowth interval decreased dry matter intake (DMI), energycorrected milk (ECM) yield, nutrient digestibility, and urinary energy output, but improved N efficiency (milk N/N intake). Postponing the first cut also decreased the efficiency of metabolizable energy use for lactation, but increased CH 4 yield (CH 4 /DMI). Extending the regrowth interval decreased feed efficiency (ECM/DMI) and increased CH 4 intensity (CH 4 /ECM). Thus, feeding regrowth silages in 2-or 3-cut systems harvested after an early first cut and short regrowth interval promoted better dairy performance and feed intake, and higher efficiency of feed and energy utilization, but with poorer N efficiency. Feeding third-cut silage improve milk yield and feed efficiency compared with second-cut silages.