Background In patients with mild disabilities after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), invisible symptoms might be easily overlooked during consultations in the outpatient clinic. We hypothesize that the Questionnaire for the Screening of Symptoms in aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SOS-SAH), a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure, might aid in screening for symptoms after aSAH. The objective of this explorative study is to evaluate the perceived impact of using the SOS-SAH in daily clinical practice for patients after aSAH, as well as to explore potential barriers to further implementation. Methods This multi-method study consists of a quantitative and a qualitative component. To evaluate differences in quality of care, a patient experience survey was sent to patients receiving usual care and to patients who received the SOS-SAH. A multiple linear regression model was applied, with the intervention group and case mix adjusters as independent variables. We described differences in the number of symptoms discussed between patients receiving usual care and those receiving care post-implementation. Following implementation, 16 patients and 6 healthcare professionals were interviewed about their perceptions concerning the impact of and barriers to using the SOS-SAH. A thematic analysis was performed to identify the main themes. Results The survey did not reveal any differences between the usual-care group and the post-implementation group on the scales of the patient experience survey. After implementation of the SOS-SAH, the number of symptoms discussed during consultation did not increase. The interviews suggest that the SOS-SAH may improve the preparation of patients by providing them with greater insight into their complaints and by raising issues for the consultation. It could also enhance the structure and efficiency of consultation, in addition to improving communication about issues that matter to patients. All patients and healthcare professionals recommended continuing the use of the SOS-SAH in daily practice. Conclusions Although no quantitative improvements were found in patient experience and symptoms discussed during consultation, implementation of the SOS-SAH could aid in screening for symptoms in patients after aSAH, and it might have a positive influence on patient preparation, while helping to structure consultations between patients and healthcare professionals.
Melihat pemberitaan tentang etnis rohingya beberapa waktu belakangan ini seringkali kita disuguhkan dengan gambaran atau pemberitaan oleh media kita terutama media yang bernafaskan Islam. Berbagai bentuk pemberitaan di tampilakan oleh media tersebut. Dengan kemasan yang berbeda-beda antara satu media dengan media yang lain. Tentu akan berbeda antara media yag beraliran nasionalis dana media yang berideologikan agama. Mulai dari sudut pandang berita, pembahasaan di teks, maupun foto atau gambar yang ada di media tersebut. Menarik bila kita cermati bagaimana media yang berideologikan Islam dalam mengemas pemberitaanya. Seringkali kita melihat media Islam di Indonesia menampilkan berita tentang etnis rohingya dengan sangat mengebu-gebu. Terkadang penulisannya cendrung provokatif dan kelihatan seperti sangat mendramatisir. Mulai dari judul berita, konten dari berita tersebut hingga foto-foto yang ditampilakan. Seperti yang menjadi kepala berita di media online Arrahmah.com ketika mengemas berit dengan judul “Setan Gundul Budha Myanmar Harus Diberi Pelajaran Setimpal” (Arrahmah.com, akses15 Juni 2013), ini tentu sangat terlihat provokatif dan sebagai media yang membawa simbol agama tentu hal ini akan sulit diterima dengan akal sehat. Contoh lainnya “Muslim Rohingya menderita diskriminasi dan penganiayaan yang hampir tak pernah henti” (Arrahmah.com, akses 15 Juni 2013). Dari dua contoh pemberitaan diatas dapat kita lihat bagaimana ada dua dikotomi yang berbeda yang ditampilkan oleh media Arrahman.com. Disatu sisi orang Budha Myanmar di hadirkan dengan sangat hina dengan kata-kata yang cendrung sangat melecehkan dengan kata “Gundul”, sedangkan disisi lain orang muslim rohingya ditampilkan dengan kondisi sangat memprihatinkan dengan menggunakan kata “penganiyaan yang hapir tak penah henti”. Tentu berita itu sangat sangat provokatif dan mengandung unsur propaganda. Padahal bila kita pelajari dalam kaidah jurnalistik, setiap wartawan harus bersikap profesional dan netral. Dimana harus ada keseimbangan fakta dalam suatu pemberitaan, namu tidak dengan apa yang terjadi di media Arrahmah.com. Keberpihakan inilah yang semakin penulis anggap relefan dengan apa yang dikatakan oleh paradigma kritis bahwa tidak ada media yang bisa netral, selalu ada kepentingan di balik pemberitaanya.
This study aims to determine the neutrality of Jambi TV in Broadcasting News in Reporting on Corruption Crimes Arrested by the Corruption Eradication Commission OTT KPK Ratification of the Jambi Province RAPBD in January-March 2018. The mass media functions as an information disseminator. Therefore the news conveyed to the public must be clear without any distortion of meaning or meaning. Jambi TV media, which has followed this case, started with a search for a hand-catching operation carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission team. The IDR 4.7 billion found by the Corruption Eradication Committee during the sting operation was allegedly related to the discussion of the 2018 Jambi Province RAPBD. This study used a qualitative research method using the Framing Zhongdang pan and Gerald M. Kosick analysis approach. perform analysis based on four dimensions, namely, Syntax, Script, Thematic, Rhetorical. Researchers use the method used by Michel. The results of this study explain, 1). That Jambi TV framed the news on the Jambi Province RAPBD corruption case according to what was found on the ground by journalists. 2). Jambi TV's position when broadcasting the news on the Jmabi Province RAPBD corruption case, the news that was broadcast was in accordance with the pact where no one takes sides, whether it's the KPK or the RAPBD corruption suspects. During an editorial meeting. Finally, the author worships Religion, Society, Nusa and the Nation.
This research is inspired by the phenomenon of some teenagers who do not joined in the recitation is takes place in the mosque, then the lack of interest in the youth who do not joined in the recitation is caused by some teenagers are lazy with younger children, some of them feel that they have been able to attend the recitation, many of students school task that must be completed quickly. This study used qualitative research methods. The key informants in this study were the qur’an teacher and the children in Pidung Village. The validity of data used triangulation techniques to test the validity of data related to the research problem being studied by researcher. Then, to analyse the data, the resercher was used data reduction, Data display and verification and conclusion drawing. The results of study showed that the strategy da’wah of Qur’an Teacher to the teenagers at Pidung Village were as follows: 1) Sentimental strategy, this strategy focuses on aspects of the heart and moves feelings by giving good advice with gentleness. This strategy is usually used by Qur’an teacher in giving the tausiah. 2) Rational strategy, this strategy focuses on aspects of the mind to encourage the Qur’an teacher students thought rationlaly, anticipate and take lessons. This strategy is used by discussing or telling the stories. 3) Sensory strategy, which is this strategy focuses on to aspects of five senses and follows to the results of research and experiments. This strategy is used by religious practice and exemplary.
This study wants to answer how Isra Magazine 'frames the issue of terrorism' in the 'Voice of Khadijah' rubric. This study uses a qualitative approach by analyzing news texts on the issue of terrorism using framing device Robert N. Enmant as an analytical tool, namely Define Problem, Causal Interpretation, Moral Evaluation, and Treatment Recommendation. The results of this study found three main frames in the coverage of Isra' Magazine related to the issue of terrorism, namely, first, violations of legal procedures. Police officers (especially Detachment 88) violated legal procedures in an effort to deal with suspected terrorist acts, both in terms of raids, arrests, detentions, and trials. Second, violations of human rights (HAM). The alleged perpetrators of terrorism and their families have become victims of human rights violations by the police and mainstream media reports. Third, the mainstream media is not neutral and objective in covering terrorism. The coverage carried out by the mainstream media often discredits suspected terrorist acts and their families. The mainstream media is accused of being just a mouthpiece for the government, in this case the police. Thus, it can be concluded that Isra' Magazine's position in looking at terrorism issues is that there is a tendency for Isra' Magazine to “defend” suspected terrorist acts and place state apparatus and mainstream media as sources of problems, even though from the beginning they emphasized that there was no special agenda to defend terrorism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.