The economic burden of cancer is substantial. It is feasible to derive tumor-specific estimates of direct and indirect costs for large numbers of cancer patients using administrative databases. Policy makers charged with providing annual cost-of-cancer estimates should incorporate data obtained from a broad range of sources.

We examined in normal men and women the effects of chronic ethanol consumption and the coadministration of cimetidine and ranitidine on the kinetics of ethanol. We found that the consumption of 45 gm ethanol per day for 3 weeks increased the apparent volume of distribution of ethanol in men from 732 to 884 ml/kg (P less than 0.01) but had no such effect in women (697 ml/kg before ethanol and 746 ml/kg after chronic ethanol consumption). This combined therapy had no effect on the rate of ethanol disappearance in either sex. In men the rate of disappearance was 165 mg/L/hr before and 168 mg/L/hr after chronic consumption, while in women the respective values were 209 and 203 mg/L/hr. The addition of either cimetidine or ranitidine had no effect on either parameter compared with values observed on day 22 of the study. In view of the known inhibitory effects of cimetidine on cytochrome P-450-dependent enzymes, our data suggest that this enzyme system does not metabolize a significant fraction of ingested ethanol in subjects who have consumed moderate doses of alcohol for several weeks.

Flecainide and verapamil are antiarrhythmic agents that may be used in combination. We have examined their pharmacodynamic interaction by M-mode echocardiography and electrocardiography in eight normal male volunteers (24 +/- 1.8 years of age). Flecainide decreased the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (-4.4 +/- 1.2%, p less than 0.008), but verapamil did not. Neither drug affected cardiac output or vascular resistance. Both drugs increased the PR interval (12 +/- 4 msec, p less than 0.01 for flecainide; 12 +/- 5, p less than 0.04 for verapamil). Flecainide, but not verapamil, increased the QTc interval (23 +/- 8 msec, p less than 0.02). Both drugs also increased the systolic time interval ratio (PEPc/LVETc) (0.074 +/- 0.012, p less than 0.0004 for flecainide; 0.029 +/- 0.008, p less than 0.007 for verapamil). The combination of flecainide and verapamil had additive effects on myocardial contractility and on atrioventricular conduction. Verapamil slightly decreased the plasma clearance of flecainide (7.78 +/- 0.60 ml/kg/min for flecainide alone, 7.34 +/- 0.48 ml/kg/min for flecainide and verapamil together, p less than 0.05). On the other hand, flecainide had no effect on the plasma clearance of verapamil, which suggests that there was little interaction between the two drugs on their pharmacokinetic parameters.