Dose-response relationships between blood lead levels and toxic effects have been evaluated in 160 lead workers in two smelters and a chemicals plant. Blood lead levels ranged from 0.77 to 13.51 mumol/litre (16-280 microgram/dl). Clinical evidence of toxic exposure was found in 70 workers (44%), including colic in 33, wrist or ankle extensor muscle weakness in 12, anaemia (Hgb less than 8.69 mumol/litre (Hb/4) or 14.0 gm/dl) in 27, elevated blood urea nitrogen (greater than or equal to 7.14 mmol/litre or 20 mg/dl) in 28, and possible encephalopathy in two. No toxicity was detected at blood lead levels below 1.93 mumol/litre (40 microgram/dl). However, 13% of workers with blood lead levels of 1.93 to 3.81 mumol/litre (40-79 microgram/dl) had extensor muscle weakness or gastrointestinal symptoms. Anaemia was found in 5% of workers with lead levels of 1.93-2.85 mumol/litre (40-59 microgram/dl), in 14% with levels of 2.90 to 3.81 mumol/litre (60-79 microgram/dl), and in 36% with levels greater than or equal to 3.86 mumol/litre (80 microgram/dl). Elevated blood urea nitrogen occurred in long-term lead workers. All but three workers with increased blood urea nitrogen had at least four years occupational lead exposure, and nine had received oral chelation; eight of this group had reduced creatinine clearance, and eight had decreased renal concentrating ability. These data support the establishment of a permissible biological limit for blood lead at a level between 1.93 and 2.90 mumol/litre (40-60 microgram/dl).

No abstract

No abstract

One hundred forty-seven persons exposed to arsenic from well water were evaluated by neurologic examination and nerve conduction studies. Total arsenic concentrations in well water ranged from 1 to 4781 micrograms/L and from 6 to 4964 micrograms/L in urine; a calculated index of arsenic ingestion ranged from 1 to 4521 micrograms/day. No dose-response relationship existed between arsenic ingestion and symptoms or physical findings compatible with peripheral neuropathy. Five of six persons with symptoms or physical findings suggestive of sensory neuropathy had normal nerve conduction velocities. Thirteen persons with elevated arsenic ingestion but no signs or symptoms of neuropathy had one or more abnormal nerve conduction velocities. No dose-response relationship, however, existed between arsenic ingestion and nerve conduction velocities. The authors concluded that arsenic ingestion from well water at the concentrations found in this Alaskan community did not result in clinical or subclinical neuropathy.

No abstract