Few studies have empirically investigated the effects of immersive virtual reality (VR) on postburn physical therapy pain control and range of motion (ROM). We performed a prospective, randomized controlled study of the effects of adding VR to standard therapy in adults receiving active-assisted ROM physical therapy, by assessing pain scores and maximal joint ROM immediately before and after therapy on two consecutive days. Thirty-nine inpatients, aged 21 to 57 years (mean 35 years), with a mean TBSA burn of 18% (range, 3–60%) were studied using a within-subject, crossover design. All patients received their regular pretherapy pharmacologic analgesia regimen. During physical therapy sessions on two consecutive days (VR one day and no VR the other day; order randomized), each patient participated in active-assisted ROM exercises with an occupational or physical therapist. At the conclusion of each session, patients provided 0 to 100 Graphic Rating Scale measurements of pain after each 10-minute treatment condition. On the day with VR, patients wore a head-position-tracked, medical care environment-excluding VR helmet with stereophonic sound and interacted in a virtual environment conducive to burn care. ROM measurements for each joint exercised were recorded before and after each therapy session. Because of nonsignificant carryover and order effects, the data were analyzed using simple paired t-tests. VR reduced all Graphic Rating Scale pain scores (worst pain, time spent thinking about the pain, and pain unpleasantness by 27, 37, and 31% respectively), relative to the no VR condition. Average ROM improvement was slightly greater with the VR condition; however, this difference failed to reach clinical or statistical significance (P = .243). Ninety-seven percent of patients reported zero to mild nausea after the VR session. Immersive VR effectively reduced pain and did not impair ROM during postburn physical therapy. VR is easily used in the hospital setting and offers a safe, nonpharmacologic adjunctive analgesic treatment.

Postoperative ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is the standard of care in liver transplantation and comprises a significant proportion of transplantation costs. Because immediate postoperative extubation has been reported previously in a selected group of liver transplant recipients, we questioned whether this protocol could be extended to a larger group of patients. We also sought to determine the proportion of patients extubated immediately after surgery that could be transferred to the surgical ward without intervening ICU care. Of 147 patients studied in a prospective trial of sequential liver transplant recipients (who were not second-transplant recipients, United Network for Organ Sharing status 1, living donor transplant recipients, or dead before the end of surgery), 13 patients did not meet postsurgical criteria for early extubation and 111 patients were successfully extubated. Eighty-three extubated patients were transferred to the surgical ward after a routine admission to the postoperative care unit. Only 3 patients who were transferred to the surgical ward experienced complications that required a greater intensity of nursing care. A learning curve detected during the 3-year study period showed that attempts to extubate increased from 73% to 96% and triage to the surgical ward increased from 52% to 82% without compromising patient safety. The use of this protocol in our institution resulted in a 1-day reduction in ICU use in 75.5% of study subjects. We therefore conclude that the majority of liver transplant recipients can be extubated safely and admitted to the surgical ward after liver transplantation surgery, thus decreasing the cost associated with ICU care. (Liver Transpl 2002;8: 676-681.) S tandard postoperative care after liver transplantation includes mechanical ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). 1,2 Clinicians believe this type of clinical management improves outcome by providing a smooth transition into the recovery phase and reducing physiological stress caused by awakening and spontaneous ventilation. 3,4 This has remained common practice despite a lack of evidence that routine postoperative ventilation or ICU admission prevents perioperative complications or benefits donor organ function. Rather, improvements in intraoperative medical management and technical surgical advances probably explain the recent trend toward fewer perioperative complications and improved patient survival. 5,6 It thus is reasonable to question whether physicians who use routine postoperative ventilation may be using unnecessary resources and incurring additional costs that do not enhance patient or donor organ outcome.Our preliminary study at the University of Colorado (Denver, CO) and University of California at San Francisco showed that immediate postoperative tracheal extubation was safe and cost-effective in a small group of patients who had perioperative characteristics associated with uncomplicated postoperative outcomes. 7 Results proved that the current ...

OBJECTIVE To examine the outcomes of neonates born by elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in women with one prior cesarean delivery and to evaluate the cost differences between elective repeat cesarean and VBAC. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 672 women with one prior cesarean delivery and a singleton pregnancy at or after 37 weeks of gestation. Women were grouped according to their intention to have an elective repeat cesarean or a VBAC (successful or failed). The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and measures of respiratory morbidity. RESULTS Neonates born by cesarean delivery had higher NICU admission rates compared with the VBAC group (9.3% compared with 4.9%, P=.025) and higher rates of oxygen supplementation for delivery room resuscitation (41.5% compared with 23.2%, P<.01) and after NICU admission (5.8% compared with 2.4%, P<.028). Neonates born by VBAC required the least delivery room resuscitation with oxygen, whereas neonates delivered after failed VBAC required the greatest degree of delivery room resuscitation. The costs of elective repeat cesarean were significantly greater than VBAC. However, failed VBAC accounted for the most expensive total birth experience (delivery and NICU use). CONCLUSION In comparison with vaginal birth after cesarean, neonates born after elective repeat cesarean delivery have significantly higher rates of respiratory morbidity and NICU-admission and longer length of hospital stay.

Advances in critical care and surgical management have significantly improved survival after burn injury over the past several decades. However, today, survival alone is an insufficient outcome. In 1994, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) created a burn model system program to evaluate the long-term sequelae of burn injuries. As part of this multicenter program, a comprehensive demographic and outcome database was developed to facilitate the study of a number of functional and psychosocial outcomes after burns. The purpose of this study is to review the database design and structure as well as the data obtained during the last 10 years. This is a descriptive study of the NIDRR database structure as well as the patient data obtained from the four participating burn centers from 1994 to 2004. Data obtained during hospitalization and at 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge were reviewed and descriptive statistics were calculated for select database fields. The database is divided into several subsections, including demographics, injury complications, patient disposition, and functional and psychological surveys. A total of 4600 patients have been entered into the NIDRR database. To date, 3449 (75%) patients were alive at discharged and consented to follow-up data collection. The NIDRR database provides an expansive repository of patient, injury, and outcome data that can be used to analyze the impact of burn injury on physical and psychosocial function and for the design of interventions to enhance the quality of life of burn survivors.