This study aims to determine firstly, the application of simple evidenciary in the application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) and secondly, the comparison of the concept of simple evidenciary in PKPU. The research method used is normative legal research, data is collected by means of literature studies and documents written descriptively and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show that first, simple evidenciary provision in Article 8 paragraph (4) in conjunction with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU, regulates that simple evidenciary applies to applications for bankruptcy statements. Whereas in the PKPU petition, in fact the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU do not require the application of simple evidenciary which states that the petition for a declaration of bankruptcy must be granted if there are facts or circumstances that are simply proven that the requirements for bankruptcy are declared. Second, although the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU do not regulate the principle of simple proof that can be applied in a PKPU application, judges can apply the simple evidenciary principle by taking into account the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice and the objectives of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU can be achieved.

This study aimed to identify the legal strength and legal consequences of release and discharge in MSAA and MRNIA as a form of personal responsibility of Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (BLBI) debt shareholders. This qualitative research followed the typology of normative legal research. The study used a conceptual approach by examining the concept of MSAA and MRNIA agreements in which a Release and Discharge clause was found. The research data was collected by means of library research and documents. All the data obtained was then evaluated using the theory of Piercing the Corporate Veil, written descriptively, and analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that formally the Release and Discharge clause in MSAA and MRNIA had the legal strength though not materially. Then the legal consequences of Release and Discharge in MSAA and MRNIA for shareholders towards BLBI debt could be personally accounted for.

This study aims to determine the legal protection for bankruptcy of solvable companies in Indonesia. The method used is qualitative by following the typology of normative legal research, data is collected by means of literature studies and documents written descriptively and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that bankruptcy decisions can occur in solvable companies, if the party applying for a bankruptcy statement has fulfilled the requirements, namely, there are debtors, there are two or more creditors, there is debt, and at least one debt has fallen due and can be paid off. billed. Meanwhile, legal protection for solvable companies that are declared bankrupt is not regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004. According to this law, if the company has been declared bankrupt, then the company is no longer capable of carrying out legal actions and general confiscation is carried out on all company assets even though the company is concerned are included in solvable companies. In the future, the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law must be designed to protect solvable companies by providing arrangements regarding company reorganization as a way to save companies from bankruptcy, providing more detailed requirements so that certain parties can apply for bankruptcy statements, and providing legal protection for solvable companies against bankruptcy. bankruptcy threat.

This study emphasizes the impact of the judicial review of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning investment toward the review of the investment law(Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal UUPM). This research is a qualitative research by following the typology of normative legal research, the research data is collected by means of literature and document studies, relevant theory relevant and written descriptively and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the State provides facilities for foreign investors regarding land rights. Hak Guna Usaha (HGU) is given a maximum period of 95 years, Hak GunaBangunan (HGB) is 80 years, and the right to use is given for 70 years and can be extended in advance. This provision certainly has a positive impact on the investment climate in Indonesia to attract foreign investors to invest. However, the provisions of the UUPM are considered to be contradicting Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, which states that natural wealth relating to the livelihood of many people is controlled by the state. The provisions of the UUPM were deemed to have violated Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution so that through a judicial review the Constitutional Court canceled the provision. This judicial review is considered to be a setback in investment provisions in Indonesia. Land rights are important for foreign investors, therefore the cancellation of the UUPM is something that cannot attract foreign investors to invest in Indonesia. In this way, Indonesia's efforts to develop the economy are deemed unattainable. It also indicates that legal certainty in Indonesia is also difficult to obtain with statutory provisions that are rapidly changing or can be overturned by a decision of the Constitutional Court through a judicial review.

Arisan yang dulunya hanya bisa dilakukan secara langsung atau tatap muka, arisan kini mulai berkembang menjadi arisan online atau arisan yang bisa dilakukan dengan cara berjauhan dan tidak bertatap muka seiring kemudahan dengan hadirnya teknologi bernama media sosial. Transaksi pembayaran uang arisan dapat dilakukan melalui Anjungan Tunai Mandiri atau e-commerce. Pelaksanaan undian arisan dilakukan menggunakan sarana media elektronik, arisan online sebagai bentuk perkembangan teknologi yang pada dasarnya membutuhkan suatu perjanjian. Tujuan kegiatan ini adalah agar anggota Karang Taruna Unit Pedukuhan Kalipucang Yogyakarta dapat memahami syarat sah perjanjian dalam arisan online sehingga tidak merugikan anggota arisan online. Metode pelaksanaan terdiri dari dua tahap yaitu tahap persiapan serta tahap pelaksanaan sosialisasi. Keseluruhan rangkaian berjalan dengan baik dengan meningkatnya pemahaman pemuda Karang Taruna Ira Kusuma terkait pentingnya memahami arisan online dalam perspektif perjanjian. Perjanjian lisan yang dilakukan di arisan online merupakan salah satu jenis perjanjian innominaat atau perjanjian tidak bernama yang belum ada keterangannya disebutkan didalam perundang-undangan yang berlaku, dengan berlandaskan asas kebebasan berkontrak dan ketika melihat kepada syarat sah dari perjanjian maka perjanjian lisan yang ada di arisan online tersebut merupakan perjanjian yang sah dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum, seperti apa yang disebutkan pada Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata bahwa sahnya perjanjian tidak harus tertulis. Maka dari itu, Perjanjian lisan dalam arisan online disebut sah apabila telah memenuhi syarat-syarat sah perjanjian serta unsur unsur yang telah disebutkan diatas. Perjanjian dalam arisan online sah dan mengikat bagi kedua belah pihak yang membuatnya. Hal ini didasarkan oleh Asas kebebasan berkontrak. Bahwasannya kontrak dibuat boleh dengan bagaimanapun bentuknya, mau tertulis dan tida tertulis. Sepanjang kedua pihak yang membuat perjanjian sama-sama sepakat dan isi dari perjanjian yang akan dibuat tidak sama sekali bertentangan dengan undang-undang dan hukum yang berlaku di masyarakat. In the past, gatherings that used to be done in person or face-to-face, are now starting to develop into online gatherings or social gatherings that can be done far apart and not face to face along with the ease with the presence of technology called social media. Social gathering payment transactions can be made through Automated Teller Machines or e-commerce. The implementation of the social gathering draw is carried out using electronic media facilities, online social gathering as a form of technological development which basically requires an agreement. The purpose of this activity is so that members of the Karang Taruna Unit of the Kalipucang Village of Yogyakarta can understand the legal terms of the agreement in the online arisan so as not to harm the online arisan members. The implementation method consists of two stages, namely the preparation stage and the socialization implementation stage. The whole series went well with the increasing understanding of the youth of Karang Taruna Ira Kusuma regarding the importance of understanding online social gathering in an agreement perspective. An oral agreement made at online arisan is one type of innominate agreement or an anonymous agreement whose explanation has not been stated in the applicable legislation, based on the principle of freedom of contract and when looking at the legal terms of the agreement, the oral agreement in the online arisan The agreement is a legal agreement and has legal force, as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code that the validity of the agreement does not have to be in writing. Therefore, an oral agreement in an online social gathering is said to be valid if it has fulfilled the legal requirements of the agreement and the elements mentioned above. The agreement in the online social gathering is legal and binding for both parties who make it. This is based on the principle of freedom of contract. That a contract may be made in any form, whether it is written or unwritten. As long as the two parties who make the agreement both agree and the contents of the agreement to be made are not at all contrary to the laws and laws that apply in society.