Objective Digital voice assistant technology provides unique opportunities to enhance clinical practice. We aimed to understand factors influencing pediatric providers' current and potential use of this technology in clinical practice. Methods We surveyed pediatric providers regarding current use and interest in voice technology in the workplace. Regression analyses evaluated provider characteristics associated with voice technology use. Among respondents not interested in voice technology, we elicited individual concerns. Results Among 114 respondents, 19 (16.7%) indicated current use of voice technology in clinical practice, and 51 (44.7%) indicated use of voice technology for nonclinical purposes. Fifty-four (47.4%) reported willingness to try digital voice assistant technology in the clinical setting. Providers who had longer clinic visits (odds ratio [OR], 3.11, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04, 9.33, p = 0.04), fewer patient encounters per day (p = 0.02), and worked in hospital-based practices (OR, 2.95, 95% CI, 1.08, 8.07, p = 0.03) were more likely to currently use voice technology in the office. Younger providers (p = 0.02) and those confident in the accuracy of voice technology (OR, 3.05, 95% CI, 1.38, 6.74, p = 0.005) were more willing to trial digital voice assistants in the clinical setting. Among respondents unwilling or unsure about trying voice assistant technology, the most common reasons elicited were concerns related to its accuracy (35%), efficiency (33%), and privacy (28%). Conclusion This national survey evaluating use and attitudes toward digital voice assistant technology by pediatric providers found that while only one-eighth of pediatric providers currently use digital voice assistant technology in the clinical setting, almost half are interested in trying it in the future. Younger provider age and confidence in the accuracy of voice technology are associated with provider interest in using voice technology in the clinical setting. Future development of voice technology for clinical use will need to consider accuracy of information, efficiency of use, and patient privacy for successful integration into the workplace.

BackgroundInstitutional antibiograms play a key role in antimicrobial stewardship and may provide a venue for clinical decision support. Our institution recently transitioned our paper antibiogram to an enhanced digital antibiogram with antibiotic recommendations for common pediatric infections. The objectives of this study were (1) to improve the accessibility of our institutional antibiogram through a digital platform and (2) to improve trainee confidence when selecting empiric antibiotics by integrating clinical decision support.MethodsThe digital antibiogram was developed and evaluated at a tertiary children’s hospital. The tool was developed iteratively over one year by our innovation and digital health accelerator with recommendations for empiric antibiotic selection provided by experts in pediatric infectious diseases (see Figure 1 for example). Usability pilot testing was performed with a group of ordering providers and the tool was released internally in October 2018. A paired pre- and post- implementation survey evaluated residents’ perceptions of the accessibility of the paper vs. digital antibiogram and their confidence when selecting empiric antibiotics. Data were analyzed by Fisher exact test.ResultsDuring the 3 months after release, the digital antibiogram was accessed 1014 times with similar proportions of views for susceptibility data, dosing, and empiric antibiotic recommendations. Of the 31 pediatric residents who responded to both pre- and post- implementation surveys, only 59% had access to a copy of the paper antibiogram. Following release of the digital antibiogram, residents referred to antibiotic susceptibilities more frequently (P < 0.05, Figure 2) and were more frequently more confident when selecting the correct antibiotic dose (P < 0.01, Figure 3). See Figure 4 for dosing recommendation example.ConclusionProviding antibiotic susceptibility and dosing recommendations digitally improved accessibility and resident confidence during antibiotic prescribing. Our digital tool provides a successful platform for displaying the antibiotic data and recommendations that enable appropriate antibiotic use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.