Biomarkers have improved the clinical application of numerous targeted agents used to treat solid tumors. In melanoma, the finding that approximately 60% of tumor cells harbor specific Val600 mutations of BRAF has increased the likelihood of response to certain agents aimed at inhibiting the mutant kinase. While dabrafenib is an effective anti-tumor agent with acceptable tolerability in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, we report the development (and outcome) of a previously unpublished acute toxic reaction observed in a patient receiving the drug.
Outcome and management of patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has evolved in the recent decade. Using a multi-institutional retrospective database we report the predictive factors and survival of lymphoma patients who relapse after allo-HCT. We evaluated 495 allo-HCT recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2015 at 3 academic US medical centers. Landmark analysis evaluating predictive factors was performed at 1 month after allo-HCT relapse with a primary endpoint of postrelapse overall survival (PR-OS). A total of 175 lymphoma patients (35%) experienced relapse after allo-HCT. Of these, 126 patients, median age 46 years (range, 19 to 71), were assessable. Most patients (86%) received subsequent therapy; 80 patients received targeted agents and 19 donor lymphocyte infusion. On univariate analysis median PR-OS for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma was 47.9 months compared with 11.3 months in patients with indolent and 10.1 months in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (P = .04). On multivariate analysis postrelapse therapy administration (no therapy versus targeted therapy: hazard ratio, .21 [95% confidence interval, .10 to .45]; no therapy versus nontargeted therapy: hazard ratio, .26 [95% confidence interval, .11 to .57]), late relapse 130 days after allo-HCT (relative to early relapse: hazard ratio, .25; P < .001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 (versus Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2: hazard ratio, .49; P = .003) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality. Patients relapsing ≥ 130 days from the time of allo-HCT yielded PR-OS of 48.8 months compared with 6.5 months in patients with early relapse (P < .001). Our data suggest that in the modern era, therapies used for patients experiencing lymphoma relapse after allo-HCT can extend survival.
181 Background: Decreasing 30-day hospital readmissions is an important quality care measure and signifies high-quality care. This study seeks to identify the benefits of Supportive Care consultations on 30-day readmissions to oncology inpatient services in an academic hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients that had at least one 30-day readmission to the medical oncology or hematological malignancy service during a 2 year period (2011-2012). Data was collected on age, sex, cancer type, stage, number of readmissions, and presence of inpatient Supportive Care consultation. Results: During the study period 410 patients were identified with at least one 30-day readmission to an oncology service. Patients with a supportive care consult, 111 (27.7%), had an average of 2.5 readmissions and patients without a consultation, 299 (72.9%), had an average of 2.0 readmissions (p = 0.014). After Supportive Care consultation a reduction of 0.87 admissions (p < 0.001) was observed. Stage IV disease was observed in 203 (49.5%) of patients studied. Conclusions: Supportive Care is often consulted for patients with significant symptoms and suffering during advanced illness. The higher observed average readmissions in patients seen by Supportive Care may reflect the complex assistance needed by this patient population. This study demonstrates a benefit of Supportive Care consultation in reducing 30-day readmissions after consultation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.