A conservative approach of CIN2 is the preferred management option for women younger than 25 years. Smoking was identified as a risk factor for progression.

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background The cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) plays a significant role in women’s cervical health and disease. Microbial alterations at the species level and characteristic community state types (CST) have been associated with acquisition and persistence of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infections that may result in progression of cervical lesions to malignancy. Current sequencing methods, especially most commonly used multiplex 16S rRNA gene sequencing, struggle to fully clarify these changes because they generally fail to provide sufficient taxonomic resolution to adequately perform species-level associative studies. To improve CVM species designation, we designed a novel sequencing tool targeting microbes at the species taxonomic rank and examined its potential for profiling the CVM. Results We introduce an accessible and practical circular probe-based RNA sequencing (CiRNAseq) technology with the potential to profile and quantify the CVM. In vitro and in silico validations demonstrate that CiRNAseq can distinctively detect species in a mock mixed microbial environment, with the output data reflecting its ability to estimate microbes’ abundance. Moreover, compared to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, CiRNAseq provides equivalent results but with improved sequencing sensitivity. Analyses of a cohort of cervical smears from hrHPV-negative women versus hrHPV-positive women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed known differences in CST occurring in the CVM of women with hrHPV-induced lesions. The technique also revealed variations in microbial diversity and abundance in the CVM of hrHPV-positive women when compared to hrHPV-negative women. Conclusions CiRNAseq is a promising tool for studying the interplay between the CVM and hrHPV in cervical carcinogenesis. This technology could provide a better understanding of cervicovaginal CST and microbial species during health and disease, prompting the discovery of biomarkers, additional to hrHPV, that can help detect high-grade cervical lesions.

Objective High‐risk human papillomavirus (HrHPV)‐positive women detected by self‐sampling require an extra visit at the general practitioner for additional cytology testing, but the loss to follow up within this triage is substantial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of reflex cytology on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples for immediate stratification of women who need referral for colposcopy. Design A prospective cohort study. Setting Two Dutch cervical cancer‐screening laboratories. Population 1014 screenees who tested hrHPV‐positive on self‐samples between 1 December 2018 and 1 August 2019. Methods Self‐samples were directly used for cytological analysis. Cytological and histological outcomes during follow up were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Main outcome measures Test performance of reflex cytology on self‐samples was determined for different thresholds and compared with physician‐taken cytology and histological outcomes. Results Reflex cytology on self‐samples for detecting abnormal cytology showed a sensitivity of 26.4% (95% CI 21.8–31.3) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI 87.7–92.8). Of all ≥CIN2 cases, 29.4% (95% CI 22.5–37.1) were detected with reflex cytology on self‐samples. The positive predictive value for detection of ≥CIN2 was higher with cytology on self‐collected samples than on physician‐collected samples. Of women who were lost to follow up, 12.9% were found to have abnormal cytology on their self‐sampled material. Conclusion Cytology testing is achievable on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples, could decrease the loss to follow up in screening and is easily implementable in the current clinical practice. Of all hrHPV‐positive women with abnormal cytology on additional physician‐collected samples, 26.4% could have been directly referred for colposcopy if triage with reflex cytology on self‐sampled material had been performed. Tweetable abstract Reflex cytology for triage of hrHPV+ self‐samples is of added value for direct referral of women for colposcopy.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Dutch cervical cancer screening program had replaced the primary cytology-based screening with primary high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening, including the opportunity to participate through self-sampling. Evaluation and balancing benefit (detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) and burden of screening (unnecessary referrals, invasive diagnostics, and overtreatment) is needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the referral rates, detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment in the new high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening program, including physician-sampled and self-sampled material, with the previous cytology-based screening program in the Netherlands. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted within the Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. Screenees with referrals for colposcopy between 2014 and 2015 (cytology-based screening) and 2017 and 2018 (high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening) were included. Data were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and compared between the 2 screening programs. The main outcome measures were referral rate, detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse, overdiagnosis (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or less in the histologic specimen), and overtreatment (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or less in the treatment specimen). RESULTS: Of the women included in the study, 19,109 received cytology-based screening, and 26,171 received high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening. Referral rates increased from 2.5% in cytology-based screening to 4.2% in high-risk human papillomavirusbased screening (þ70.2%). Detection rates increased to 46.2% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, 32.2% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse, and 31.0% for cervical cancer, and overdiagnosis increased to 143.4% with high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening. Overtreatment rates were similar in both screening periods. The positive predictive value of referral for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening was 34.6% compared with 40.2% in cytology-based screening. Women screened through self-sampling were at higher risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse detection (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.20e1.59) and receiving treatment (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.16e1.48) than those screened through physician-sampling. CONCLUSION: Compared with cytology-based screening, high-risk human papillomavirus-based screening increases detection of highgrade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, with 462 more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse cases per 100,000 women but at the expense of 850 more cases per 100,000 women with invasive diagnostics indicating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or less.