An experimental investigation of the effects of pre-bond contamination on Mode-I fracture toughness of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) bonded joints is presented in this paper. Two prebond contamination scenarios were considered; namely, the silicon-based release agent and moisture. The two contamination scenarios were realized in one of the composite substrates prior to bonding. The common characteristic of the two contamination scenarios is that they lead in the formation of defects in the form of weak bonds that cannot be detected by conventional nondestructive testing techniques. The contamination effects on Mode-I fracture toughness of the bonded joints were investigated by conducting mechanical tests on double-cantilever beam specimens and comparing the results with relative measurements taken from reference specimens. Prior to mechanical testing, the bonding quality of the specimens was tested using ultrasonic C-scan inspection. Both the release agent and moisture are found to significantly degrade the Mode-I fracture toughness of the joints. For the release agent, the effect was more significant for silicon concentrations over 5 at%; a complete lack of adhesion was observed for silicon concentrations over 7 at%. At low values of relative humidity, there was a small increase in Mode-I critical energy release rate while at larger values there is a decrease which reaches 26% for the higher relative humidity percentage. The results from the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) tests verify the inability of conventional NDT to detect the defects resulting at the interface between the contaminated adherend's surface and the adhesive for both contamination scenarios.
Adhesive bonding is applied by the aircraft industry both for assembling composite structural parts and implementing composite patch repairs in damaged structural parts. In both applications, there exist several scenarios, related to surface contamination and processing, that could affect bonding quality and thus, degrade bond strength. In this paper, the detailed effects of pre-bond contamination with a hydraulic fluid, thermal degradation of the composite substrate, as well as poor curing (lower curing temperature) on strength of composite-bonded joints were studied experimentally by conducting mode I fracture toughness tests on double-cantilever beam specimens. These three application scenarios are possible to appear in the implementation of a composite patch repair in a damaged composite structural part. The experimental results showed a contradictory effect as the presence of the hydraulic fluid and poor curing degrades the fracture toughness whereas thermal degradation enhances fracture toughness of the composite-bonded joints. These findings are explained by means of extended non-destructive inspection, surface analysis, and evaluation of fracture surfaces
Increasing morbidity of cardiovascular diseases in modern society has made it crucial to develop artificial small-caliber cardiovascular grafts for surgical intervention of diseased natural arteries, as alternatives to the gold standard autologous implants. Synthetic small-caliber grafts are still not in use due to increased risk of restenosis, lack of lumen re-endothelialization and mechanical mismatch, leading sometimes either to graft failure or to unsuccessful remodeling and pathology of the distal parts of the anastomosed healthy vascular tissues. In this work, we aimed to synthesize small-caliber polymeric (polycaprolactone) tissue-engineered vascular scaffolds that mimic the structure and biomechanics of natural vessels. Electrospinning was implemented to prepare microstructured polymeric membranes with controlled axis-parallel fiber alignment. Consequently, we designed small-caliber multilayer anisotropic biodegradable nanofibrous tubular scaffolds, giving attention to their radial compliance. Polycaprolactone scaffold morphology and mechanical properties were assessed, quantified, and compared with those of native vessels and commercial synthetic grafts. Results showed a highly hydrophobic scaffold material with a three-layered tubular morphology, 4-mm internal diameter/0.25 ± 0.09-mm thickness, consisting of predominantly axially aligned thin (1.156 ± 0.447 μm), homogeneous and continuous microfibers, with adequate (17.702 ± 5.369 μm) pore size, potentially able to promote cell infiltration in vivo. In vitro accelerated degradation showed a 5% mass loss within 17–25 weeks. Mechanical anisotropy was attained as a result, almost one order of magnitude difference of the elastic modulus (18 ± 3 MPa axially/1 ± 0.3 MPa circumferentially), like that of natural arterial walls. Furthermore, a desirable radial compliance (5.04 ± 0.82%, within the physiological pressure range) as well as cyclic stability of the tubular scaffold was achieved. Finally, cytotoxicity evaluation of the polymeric scaffolds revealed that the materials were nontoxic and did not release substances harmful to living cells (over 80% cell viability achieved).
Climate change and global warming pose great sustainability challenges to the aviation industry. Alternatives to petroleum-based fuels (hydrogen, natural gas, etc.) have emerged as promising aviation fuels for future aircraft. The present study aimed to contribute to the understanding of the impact of material selection on aviation sustainability, accounting for the type of fuel implemented and circular economy aspects. In this context, a decision support tool was introduced to aid decision-makers and relevant stakeholders to identify and select the best-performing materials that meet their defined needs and preferences, expressed through a finite set of conflicting criteria associated with ecological, economic, and circularity aspects. The proposed tool integrates life-cycle-based metrics extending to both ecological and economical dimensions and a proposed circular economy indicator (CEI) focused on the material/component level and linked to its quality characteristics, which also accounts for the quality degradation of materials which have undergone one or more recycling loops. The tool is coupled with a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology in order to reduce subjectivity when determining the importance of each of the considered criteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.