The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the health sector and the economy. As an affected country, the Indonesian government has issued many policies to prevent and control the Covid-19 virus. However, substantial problems arise, with the absence of compliance from some people in certain areas, such as Bandar Lampung City, Lampung Province. Although the local government issued Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2020 concerning Adaptation of New Habits in the Prevention and Control of Corona Virus Disease 2019 to regulate the community's obligations in implementing the 3M Health Protocol in public spaces, the main problem in this study is the people of Lampung Province's lack of discipline in implementing the 3M Health Protocol and the dynamics of implementing e-Court during the pandemic. Therefore, there needs to be a review regarding the effectiveness of implementing the 3M Health Protocol to prevent the spread of Covid-19 in Bandar Lampung, as well as the application of e-Court in the perspective of other laws and regulations. The research method used in this study is empirical law research, by taking a problem-based approach to a behavioral approach supported by primary data sourced from data sources. The implementation of the 3M health protocol through Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2020 shows quite effective results in its application in public spaces based on a survey of 86 respondents from the people of Bandar Lampung City. It was recorded that 83.5% of 86 respondents stated that public services at the Court had been carried out online, while 16.5% stated that they were done online through e-Court but limited. However, when taken as a whole, the implementation of health protocols and e-Courts as part of the effort to prevent the spread of Covid-19 is relatively good; it's just that certain obstacles must be evaluated.

The principle of simple, fast and inexpensive process is a very important principle in the implementation of procedural law. In practice, court dispute resolution processes fail to take into account common interests, tend to create new problems, are slow to resolve, costly, unresponsive, and create hostility among disputing parties. In response, and in an effort to strengthen and streamline the functioning of the judiciary, the Supreme Court (MA) has introduced mediation as an integral part of the court's dispute resolution process. The accumulation of cases is expected to be overcome. However, empirical facts show the opposite. According to previously published research, the trend of cases resolved by litigation remains high and is increasing each year, including Class IA in Tanjung Karang District Court. As a result, there were 209 cases in 2017, 237 cases in 2018, and 260 cases in 2019. Based on these matters, a comprehensive study needs to be conducted to analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution in the First Class Court of Tanjung Karang District Court.

With the adoption of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, 80 sectoral laws were amended, 51 derivative regulations were drafted in the form of Government Regulations (47) and Presidential Regulations (4), and the direction of decentralization was changed. Changed to decentralization. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of the implementation of the Employment Creation Act on the basic services sector of local governments. The results of our analysis using a textbook approach show that: The Employment Creation Act amended Article 8 of Law No. 23 Year 2014 on Local Government and was last amended by Law No. 9 Year 2015 on Second Amendment to Law No. 23 Year 2014 and added 2 Articles. local administration. Modifications and additions to these articles without affecting her six obligations of the local authority relating to basic services stipulated in Law No. 23 of 2014. However, the implications for mandatory local government affairs related to basic services actually arise from changes to related sectoral laws which are also amended by the Job Creation Law.