SUMMARYTemporary threshold shift (TTS) after loud noise exposure was investigated in a male and a female beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas). The thresholds were evaluated using the evoked-potential technique, which allowed for threshold tracing with a resolution of ~1min. The fatiguing noise had a 0.5octave bandwidth, with center frequencies ranging from 11.2 to 90kHz, a level of 165dBre.1μPa and exposure durations from 1 to 30min. The effects of the noise were tested at probe frequencies ranging from -0.5 to +1.5octaves relative to the noise center frequency. The effect was estimated in terms of both immediate (1.5min) postexposure TTS and recovery duration. The highest TTS with the longest recovery duration was produced by noises of lower frequencies (11.2 and 22.5kHz) and appeared at a test frequency of +0.5octave. At higher noise frequencies (45 and 90kHz), the TTS decreased. The TTS effect gradually increased with prolonged exposures ranging from 1 to 30min. There was a considerable TTS difference between the two subjects.

The sensitivity of human hearing to shifts in rippled spectrum patterns of sound was investigated. The test signal was band-limited rippled noise with spectrum ripples of various frequency spacing and bandwidth; this type of sound may be considered as a quantitatively controlled imitation of complex natural sounds. The listener was required to detect a shift in the spectrum ripple phase while keeping the other parameters of the noise constant. For cosine-shaped ripples, the lowest threshold (1.1%) was found at a ripple frequency of 3.5 ripples per octave (rpo), which corresponds to a ripple spacing of 20% of the center frequency. The threshold increased for both lower and higher ripple densities. Qualitatively similar patterns of threshold dependence on ripple density were observed for center frequencies from 1 to 4 kHz. Making the ripples narrower than cosine decreased the thresholds to 0.7%-0.75% for ripple densities of 2-5 rpo. Keeping the ripple width constant at 3.5%-7.5% of the frequency resulted in a monotonic threshold dependence on ripple density: The threshold decreased with decreasing density (down to 0.7%). An excitation-pattern model explains qualitatively the observed dependence of the ripple-phase shift threshold on ripple pattern parameters.

No abstract

The resolution of spectral ripples is a useful test for the spectral resolution of hearing. However, the use of different measurement paradigms might yield diverging results because of a paradigm-dependent contribution of excitation-pattern and temporal-processing mechanisms. In the present study, ripple-density resolution was measured in normal-hearing listeners for several frequency bands (centered at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), using two paradigms: (i) discrimination of a rippled-spectrum test signal from a rippled reference signal differing by the ripple phase pattern, and (ii) discrimination of a rippled-spectrum test signal from a nonrippled reference signal. For the rippled reference signals, the resolution slightly depended on signal frequency. For the nonrippled reference signals, the resolution depended on the signal frequency; it varied from 8.8 ripples/oct at 0.5 kHz to 34.2 ripples/oct at 4 kHz. Excitation-pattern and temporal-processing models of spectral analysis were considered. Predictions of the excitation-pattern model agreed with the data obtained with the rippled reference signals. In contrast, predictions of the temporal-processing model agreed with the data obtained with the nonrippled reference signals. Thus, depending on the used reference signal type, the ripple-density resolution estimates characterize the discrimination abilities of the corresponding mechanisms.

Rippled-spectrum stimuli are used to evaluate the resolution of the spectro-temporal structure of sounds. Measurements of spectrum-pattern resolution imply the discrimination between the test and reference stimuli. Therefore, estimates of rippled-pattern resolution could depend on both the test stimulus and the reference stimulus type. In this study, the ripple-density resolution was measured using combinations of two test stimuli and two reference stimuli. The test stimuli were rippled-spectrum signals with constant phase or rippled-spectrum signals with ripple-phase reversals. The reference stimuli were rippled-spectrum signals with opposite ripple phase to the test or nonrippled signals. The spectra were centered at 2 kHz and had an equivalent rectangular bandwidth of 1 oct and a level of 70 dB sound pressure level. A three-alternative forced-choice procedure was combined with an adaptive procedure. With rippled reference stimuli, the mean ripple-density resolution limits were 8.9 ripples/oct (phase-reversals test stimulus) or 7.7 ripples/oct (constant-phase test stimulus). With nonrippled reference stimuli, the mean resolution limits were 26.1 ripples/oct (phase-reversals test stimulus) or 22.2 ripples/ oct (constant-phase test stimulus). Different contributions of excitation-pattern and temporal-processing mechanisms are assumed for measurements with rippled and nonrippled reference stimuli: The excitation-pattern mechanism is more effective for the discrimination of rippled stimuli that differ in their ripple-phase patterns, whereas the temporal-processing mechanism is more effective for the discrimination of rippled and nonrippled stimuli.