BackgroundThe major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.Materials and MethodsA European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.ResultsThe TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.ConclusionsThere are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.MessageAn evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Sirolimus is very probably responsible for interstitial pneumonitis on the following grounds: (a) occurrence of pneumonitis during sirolimus therapy; (b) absence of any other causes; and (c) resolution within 3 months of sirolimus discontinuation or dose reduction. Sirolimus should now be added to the list of possible causes of pulmonary complications after renal transplantation. Discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus led to complete and lasting resolution of symptoms.

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-derived (MALT) lymphoma, a low grade B-cell extranodal lymphoma, is the most frequent subset of primary pulmonary lymphoma. Our objective was to evaluate the initial extent of disease and to analyse the characteristics and long-term outcome of these patients.All chest and pathological departments of teaching hospitals in Paris were contacted in order to identify patients with a histological diagnosis of primary pulmonary lymphoma of the MALT subtype.63 cases were identified. The median age was 60 yrs. 36% of cases had no symptoms at diagnosis. 46% of patients had at least one extrapulmonary location of lymphoma. The estimated 5-and 10-yr overall survival rates were 90% and 72%, respectively. Only two of the nine observed deaths were related to lymphoma. Age and performance status were the only two adverse prognostic factors for survival. Extrapulmonary location of lymphoma was not a prognostic factor for overall survival or for progression-free survival. Treatment with cyclophosphamide or anthracyclin was associated with shorter progression-free survival, when compared with chlorambucil.The survival data confirm the indolent nature of pulmonary MALT lymphoma. Better progression-free survival was observed with chlorambucil when compared with cyclophosphamide or anthracyclin.