Abstract. The time complexity of suffix tree construction has been shown to be equivalent to that of sorting: O(n) for a constant-size alphabet or an integer alphabet and O(n log n) for a general alphabet. However, previous algorithms for constructing suffix arrays have the time complexity of O(n log n) even for a constant-size alphabet.In this paper we present a linear-time algorithm to construct suffix arrays for integer alphabets, which do not use suffix trees as intermediate data structures during its construction. Since the case of a constant-size alphabet can be subsumed in that of an integer alphabet, our result implies that the time complexity of directly constructing suffix arrays matches that of constructing suffix trees.

The time complexity of suffix tree construction has been shown to be equivalent to that of sorting: O(n) for a constant-size alphabet or an integer alphabet and O(n log n) for a general alphabet. However, previous algorithms for constructing suffix arrays have the time complexity of O(n log n) even for a constant-size alphabet.In this paper we present a linear-time algorithm to construct suffix arrays for integer alphabets, which do not use suffix trees as intermediate data structures during its construction. Since the case of a constant-size alphabet can be subsumed in that of an integer alphabet, our result implies that the time complexity of directly constructing suffix arrays matches that of constructing suffix trees.

Abstract. Succinct representation is a space-efficient method to represent n discrete objects by O(n) bits. In order to access directly the ith object of succinctly represented data structures in constant time, two fundamental functions, rank and select, are commonly used. However, little efforts were made on analyzing practical behaviors of these functions despite their importance for succinct representations.In this paper we analyze the behavior of Clark's algorithm which is the only one to support select in constant time using o(n)-bit space of extra space, and show that the performance of Clark's algorithm gets worse as the number of 1's in a bit-string becomes fewer and there exists a worst case in which a large amount of operations are needed. Then, we propose two algorithms that overcome the drawbacks of Clark's. These algorithms take constant time for select, and one uses o(n) bits for extra space and the other uses n + o(n) bits in the worst case. Experimental results show that our algorithms compute select faster than Clark's.

No abstract

No abstract