Stensvold D, Tjønna AE, Skaug EA, Aspenes S, Stølen T, Wisløff U, Slørdahl SA. Strength training versus aerobic interval training to modify risk factors of metabolic syndrome. J Appl Physiol 108: 804-810, 2010. First published January 21, 2010 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00996.2009.-Metabolic syndrome is characterized by central obesity, elevated blood pressure, high fasting glucose and triglyceride levels, and low HDL levels. Regular physical activity can improve the metabolic profile and reduce the risks of cardiovascular diseases and premature mortality. However, the optimal training regime to treat metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular abnormalities remains undefined. Fortythree participants with metabolic syndrome were randomized to one of the following groups: aerobic interval training (AIT; n ϭ 11), strength training (ST; n ϭ 11), a combination of AIT and ST (COM; n ϭ 10) 3 times/wk for 12 wk, or control (n ϭ 11). Risk factors comprising metabolic syndrome were evaluated before and after the intervention. Waist circumference (in cm) was significantly reduced after AIT [95% confidence interval (CI): Ϫ2.5 to Ϫ0.04], COM (95% CI: Ϫ2.11 to Ϫ0.63), and ST (95% CI: Ϫ2.68 to Ϫ0.84), whereas the control group had an increase in waist circumference (95% CI: 0.37-2.9). The AIT and COM groups had 11% and 10% increases in peak O2 uptake, respectively. There were 45% and 31% increases in maximal strength after ST and COM, respectively. Endothelial function, measured as flow-mediated dilatation (in %), was improved after AIT (95% CI: 0.3-3), COM (95% CI: 0.3-3), and ST (95% CI:

Our findings suggest that, in overweight/obese individuals, isocaloric bouts of moderate- or high-intensity exercise lead to a similar appetite response. This strengthens previous findings in normal-weight individuals that acute exercise, even at high intensity, does not induce any known physiological adaptation that would lead to increased EI.

IntroductionEpidemiological studies suggest that exercise has a tremendous preventative effect on morbidity and premature death, but these findings need to be confirmed by randomised trials. Generation 100 is a randomised, controlled study where the primary aim is to evaluate the effects of 5 years of exercise training on mortality in an elderly population.Methods and analysisAll men and women born in the years 1936–1942 (n=6966), who were residents of Trondheim, Norway, were invited to participate. Between August 2012 and June 2013, a total of 1567 individuals (790 women) were included and randomised to either 5 years of two weekly sessions of high-intensity training (10 min warm-up followed by 4×4 min intervals at ∼90% of peak heart rate) or, moderate-intensity training (50 min of continuous work at ∼70% of peak heart rate), or to a control group that followed physical activity advice according to national recommendations. Clinical examinations, physical tests and questionnaires will be administered to all participants at baseline, and after 1, 3 and 5 years. Participants will also be followed up by linking to health registries until year 2035.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been conducted according to the SPIRIT statement. All participants signed a written consent form, and the study has been approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, Norway. Projects such as this are warranted in the literature, and we expect that data from this study will result in numerous papers published in world-leading clinical journals; we will also present the results at international and national conferences.Trial registration numberClinical trial gov NCT01666340.