No abstract

No abstract

Postural and therefore biomechanical standardization in strength testing has not been rigorously and consistently applied. To develop a quantitative relationship between strength and posture (body position, symmetry, and reach) 30 normal subjects (18 male and 12 females) were required to stoop and squat lift or exert in the relevant posture against a standardized instrumented handle. The isometric lifting efforts and isokinetic lifts were studied. The isokinetic lifts were done at a linear velocity of 50cm/s of the hand displacement from the floor to the knuckle heights of the respective subjects in stoop and squat postures. The isometric stoop lifting efforts were exerted in two standardized postures: (a) with 60 degrees hip flexion; and (b) with 90 degrees hip flexion. The isometric squat lifting efforts were also exerted in two standardized postures: (a) with 90 degrees knee flexion; and (b) with 135 degrees knee flexion. All isometric lifting efforts and isokinetic lifts were performed at half, three-quarters, and full horizontal reach in sagitally symmetrical, 30 degrees left lateral, and 60 degrees left lateral planes. Isometric stoop and squat lifting efforts were also measured in self-selected optimal postures. These 56 conditions were tested in random order. The analysis of variance revealed that the gender, the mode of lifting, the postural asymmetry and reach of lifting affected the strength significantly (p less than 0.0001). Most two-way and three-way interactions were significant (p less than 0.01). Of 108 prediction regression equations, 103 were significant with up to 90% of the variation explained by anthropometric variables and sagittal plane strength. The reach affected the strength most profoundly followed by postural asymmetry and the mode of lifting.

The purpose of this study was to measure the torque, the magnitude of the electromyogram (EMG) signal and the phase relationship of 14 muscles during trunk axial rotation. Fifty normal healthy volunteers (27 males and 23 females) with no lower-back injury participated in the study. The subjects were seated in an upright position in the axial rotation tester (AROT) after applying surface electrodes bilaterally to the following muscles: pectoralis major, rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, and erector spinae at T10 and L3. They were stabilized from the hip down, and the shoulder harness of the AROT was applied to their shoulders. These subjects performed maximal isometric axial rotations to the left and right in a random order. The torque and 14 channels of EMG were monitored, and their magnitude, slope of the increase in magnitude, and timing of the anticipation and onset activity were determined. The results revealed that the females produced 65% of the torque of their male counterparts. The pattern and magnitude of EMG in performing these tasks were significantly different between males and females (P<0.01). Males generated the greatest activity in their ipsilateral latissimus dorsi followed by their contralateral external oblique muscles. In the females, maximal EMG activity was observed in their contralateral pectoralis muscle. Thus, under the current experimental conditions, the females employed a different muscle recruitment strategy compared to the males. Each muscle involved in axial rotation was significantly different from the other (P < 0.01). The timing pattern for these activities was inconsistent, implying that there is no fixed-order phasic recruitment of the torso muscles during maximal isometric axial rotation.

The purpose of this investigation was to study the torque and electromyogram (EMG) in axial rotation from pre-rotated postures. A group of 50 young adults (27 men and 23 women) volunteered for the study. These prepared subjects carried out axial rotation with pre-rotated postures in the direction of pre-rotation and away from it. Torque and EMG were recorded bilaterally from latissimus dorsi, erector spinae at L(3) and T(10) levels, pectoralis, rectus abdominis, external and internal oblique. In 15 degrees pre-rotated posture the axial rotation in the direction of pre-rotation reduced the torque by between 11% and 17% and away from it increased the torque by 12% to 16%. In 30 degrees pre-rotated posture the decrement in torque in the direction of pre-rotation was 24%-33%, and in the opposite direction the gain was between 21% and 32%. Even with decreased torque with rotation in the pre-rotation direction the EMG increased up to 123%. The EMG magnitude and slopes of EMG in these activities demonstrated significant increases while in the opposite direction slight decreases were observed. The EMG of each muscle was significantly different from all other muscles ( P<0.001). A significant ( P<0.01) but low correlation between EMG and torque was obtained. Significant linear regressions between torque and EMG of different muscles were obtained ( P<0.01; r=up to 0.70).