We have developed the first validated disease-specific quality of life instrument for patients with acoustic neuromas. Given the lack of a validated equivalent, this tool has the potential to become a critical outcome measure for studies evaluating treatment of patients with acoustic neuromas.

With the magnetic resonance imaging techniques now available, lipomas can be reliably differentiated from other masses within the CPA and IAC, so histopathologic diagnosis is rarely necessary. Because of the potential for significant morbidity with resection of these lesions, we believe that conservative follow-up is the best treatment option for patients with these rare lesions. Surgery is indicated only when significant progressive or disabling symptoms are present.

Objective:To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System, for adults with residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound hearing loss in the mid to high frequencies.Study Design:Prospective, repeated measures.Setting:Multicenter, hospital.Patients:Seventy-three subjects implanted with PULSAR or SONATA cochlear implants with FLEX24 electrode arrays.Intervention:Subjects were fit postoperatively with an audio processor, combining electric stimulation and acoustic amplification.Main Outcome Measures:Unaided thresholds were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Speech perception was assessed at these intervals using City University of New York sentences in noise and consonant–nucleus–consonant words in quiet. Subjective benefit was assessed at these intervals via the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale questionnaires.Results:Sixty-seven of 73 subjects (92%) completed outcome measures for all study intervals. Of those 67 subjects, 79% experienced less than a 30 dB HL low-frequency pure-tone average (250–1000 Hz) shift, and 97% were able to use the acoustic unit at 12 months postactivation. In the EAS condition, 94% of subjects performed similarly to or better than their preoperative performance on City University of New York sentences in noise at 12 months postactivation, with 85% demonstrating improvement. Ninety-seven percent of subjects performed similarly or better on consonant–nucleus–consonant words in quiet, with 84% demonstrating improvement.Conclusion:The MED-EL EAS System is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high frequencies who do not benefit from traditional amplification.

Tumor that encompasses more than 270 degrees of the carotid artery probably cannot be removed from the artery. Tumor that involves 270 degrees or less of the artery can be removed.

Older patients are more vulnerable to detrimental effects of Gamma Knife radiosurgery on hearing. We propose that cochlear dose volume histograms be created and used to reduce the percentage of the cochlear volume exposed to radiation doses greater than 5.3 Gy. This is the first report to suggest that the conformity index tumor coverage may be an important predictor of hearing outcomes.