Other than periodontal attachment loss, severe tooth mobility, and dental caries, no single factor was a dominant predictor of tooth loss; instead, numerous factors made statistically significant but small contributions to variation in tooth loss. Tooth loss apparently is the result of complex interactions among dental disease, incident dental signs and symptoms, tendency to use dental care in response to specific dental problems, dental attitudes, and ability to afford non-extraction treatment alternatives.

The Florida Dental Care Study (FDCS) is a longitudinal study of changes in oral health, which included at baseline 873 subjects who had at least one tooth, were 45 years or older, and who participated for an interview and clinical examination. Two objectives of the FDCS were to: (i) describe satisfaction with chewing ability in a diverse sample of dentate adults; and (ii) quantify the associations between satisfaction with chewing ability and other measures of oral health. Approximately 16% of subjects reported that they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their chewing ability. Bivariate and multivariate results provided consistent evidence of the construct validity of a proposed multi-dimensional model of satisfaction with chewing ability. Multiple regression analysis suggested that dissatisfaction with chewing ability was independently associated with 12 specific clinical and self-reported measures of oral disease/ tissue damage, pain, functional limitation, and disadvantage. The self-reported measures of oral health and the proposed model of satisfaction with chewing ability improve our understanding of this important oral health outcome in diverse population groups.

Previous investigators have identified residential differences in the job satisfaction of hospital nurses. However, the degree to which the greater job satisfaction of rural nurses can be generalized beyond hospitals to other work settings, including nursing homes, is unknown. The purpose of this research was to examine the job satisfaction of nurses (registered and licensed practical) employed in both rural and urban nursing homes. A total of 281 nurses from 26 participating nursing homes completed a mailed questionnaire that measured the personal and job-specific characteristics of the nurses and the contextual properties of the facilities in which they worked. The data indicated no statistically significant differences in the overall job satisfaction, or on any of the five subscales of the instrument, between rural and urban nurses. However, a pooled multivariate model identified five factors that predicted the job satisfaction of nurses employed in long-term care facilities: the employees' race and personal income; the employees' perception that their supervisor was interested in their career aspirations; the length of time that the nurses had intended to stay at the time of their hiring; and their current intent to leave.

No abstract

No abstract