Introduction: Pain management in total knee arthroplasty is aimed to minimize postoperative pain and improve functional outcomes in patients. Although there are many methods used for controlling the pain there has been no consensus on most appropriate or the best protocol. Adductor canal block (ACB) has the unique advantage of providing localized analgesia but it doesn't provide pain relief to the posterior capsule, it has been postulated that IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee) combined with ACB will provide better pain relief than ACB alone. Materials and Methods: 60 Patients were studied in two groups. Group A had those patients with ACB+ ipack and Group B had ACB. Group A -Patient were subjected to combined ACB block with IPACK. Group B -Patient in this group were given ACB. Patient were studied for pain score VAS on Day 0 and Day 1 morning and evening, range of movement at postoperative Day 1 and distance walked on Day 1. Results: Group B had better outcome as compared to Group A. The mean VAS score for the ACB+IPACK group was less than for ACB alone at end of Day 0 and Day 1 in morning and evening. The ROM for the ACB+IPACK group was better than ACB alone and number of steps walked by patients were more in ACB+IPACK as compared to ACB alone. The statistical difference was significant when Adductor +IPACK group was compared to Adductor group for VAS, ROM and number of steps walked. Conclusion: ACB+IPACK is better mode than ACB for control of postoperative pain in patient undergoing Total knee replacement. IPACK is relatively safe and combined with adductor canal block decreases posterior pain in TKR patients.

A nine years old boy, who had suffered septic arthritis at the age of two years and presented now with a limp, hip instability, leg length discrepancy. The patient was treated by adductor tenotomy and upper tibial pin traction. When head remnant reached the level of the acetabulum, open reduction and Pemberton osteotomy was done to achieve cover of the femoral head. The purpose of this report is to highlight the six years followup of reconstruction of sequale of septic arthritis of hip joint.

Introduction:The of aim treatment of these fractures is prevention of malunion and early mobilization. There are various treatment options available, the ideal choice of treatment is internal fixation. Most common used device used for fixation is DHS with side plate assemblies. The best suited implant for management is PFN. PFN is better treatment modality considering its biomechanical properties. The claimed advantage with PFN is that a smaller exposure is required than for a sliding screw it may therefore be associated with less blood loss, shorter operating time and less morbidity. Also in osteoporotic bone PFN fixation carries definitive advantage over DHS fixation device.

Background: The incidence of femoral neck fractures, one of the most common traumatic injuries in the elderly increases continuously due to the ageing of population on the planet and urbanization. Aims and Objective of the Study: To study the incidence of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly population with respect to age, sex, occupation, fracture type and laterality of injury. Materials and Methods: The prospective study included 30 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures referred to the Department of Orthopaedics, Ashwini Hospital, Gulbarga were selected for this study. Patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures and aged above 55 years were considered. Patients were briefed about the nature of the study, the interventions used and written, informed consent was obtained. Further, descriptive data of the participants like name, age, sex, detailed history, were obtained by interviewing the participants and clinical examination and necessary investigations were recorded on predesigned and pretested proforma. Results: Majority of the patients (seven patients, 23.33%) were in the age group between 71 to 75 years and five patients, (16.67%) each were in the age groups of 55 to 60 years, 76 to 80 years and above 80 years. In the present study, out of the 30 patients there 18 were female accounting to 60% and 12 male patients making up the remaining 40%. The average interval between admission to the hospital and surgery was 3.6 days with a range of 01 to 17days. The average duration of hospital stay was 13.3 days with a range of 7 to 26 days. The duration of hospital stay is less in our series as the patients were mobilized early. Out of 18 female patients 14 females were house wives. Three were retired from job, and one was self-employed. Among the males, seven were retired from their jobs, four males were businessman and one male patient was self-employed. Majority of the fractures occurred due to fall in bathroom (56.67%) and fall in living room (30%). Right side involvement was more commonly seen than the Left in this study group. Right side was involved in twenty patients making up for 66.67% of the fractures and the left was involved in ten patients accounting for 33.33% of the fractures. Out of the 30 fractures, majority were type IV fractures (23 patients) accounting for 76.7%. Remaining 23.3% (07 patients) were type III fractures. Conclusion: In conclusion, hip fractures are a serious injury in the elderly population. There is a very mortality rate and morbidity rate following hip fractures in the elderly. Once diagnosis has been made, appropriate stabilization of the patient from a medical standpoint and rapid operative fixation of the fracture or prosthetic replacement helps patients obtain a better functional result. Adequate rehabilitation in an inpatient setting, as well as at the patient's home with home health is an important adjunct to an overall successful outcome.

Background: Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) provides tangible evidence for its usage in unstable pertrochanteric fractures. There are a veritable number of references which show that PFN by virtue of its intramedullary fixation reduces the tensile strain thereby mitigating implant failure. Ours is a prospective study done on 50 subjects to assess the outcome of PFN usage in unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Methodology: 50 patients with Jensen Michaelsen type III, IV, V intertrochanteric and reverse oblique fractures were included in the study. The reduction obtained intra operatively was assessed using the modified criteria of Baumgaertner. Follow up evaluations were done at 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks thereafter. Clinical evaluation was done using the Mobility score of Parker and Palmer. Radiographic parameters like fracture union, screw slide and degree of varus collapse were also assessed. Statistical analysis was provided by Friedman test. Results: Jensen Michaelsen type IV was the most common pattern observed (44%). The mean pre-injury parker score was 8.4. Patients with reverse oblique fracture morphology, type V fractures and patients with osteoporosis were treated with Long PFN (19 cases). The mean operating time was 92 minutes (range 60 -180), and the mean blood loss during the surgery was 145 ml (range 100ml -320 ml). The reduction was good in 40 patients (80%) and acceptable in the rest. The average time taken for fracture union was 15 weeks. It was observed that patients reached their preoperative mobility score of Parker and Palmer by 6 months post-surgery which was statistically significant (χ2 = 217.642, p < .001). Discussion: Proximal Femoral Nailing is done through a minimally invasive approach not disturbing the fracture hematoma which is a vital in fracture consolidation. The biomechanics of intramedullary fixation in cases of destabilised medial cortex is optimised by medialization of the fulcrum point and resultant reduction of the bending moment with respect to proximal fixation. Fracture reduction was good in 80% cases and in 10 cases the reduction was acceptable with a mean varus malalignment of 13.2 degrees.The mean intraoperative blood loss of 145 ml in our series compares favourably with previously reported values in the literature. Most of the fractures in our series (66%) united by 12-14 weeks. The mean preoperative mobility score of Parker was 8.4, which was reached by patients on their 6 th postoperative month (p & lt; 0.001). Each period showed statistically significant improvement over the previous period as evident from the rank total of the scores and the critical ratio.