This writing is oriented to find out how the legal aspects of evidence on cybercrime in the national criminal law system and law enforcement policies against cybercrime. The method uses is normatif legal research. Based on the results of the study it can be seen that the legal aspects of proving cybercrime have been strictly regulated in several laws and regulations in positive law in Indonesia. Provisions regarding Cybercrime are also regulated in international regulations without reducing the opportunity for each individual to continue to develop creativity in developing information technology. Law enforcement policies against cybercrime are carried out with a penal and non-penal approach. Seen from the point of view of criminal policy, efforts to overcome cybercrime certainly cannot be done partially with criminal law (penal), but must also be taken with an integral/systemic approach as well as a preventive approach (non-penal). Keywords : Policy; Law enforcement; Cybercrime; Proof; National Criminal Law System

The problem in this study is how the implementation of the conception of Crime Prevention Through Social Development (CPTSD) by Bhabinkamtibmas in combating criminal acts of terrorism and why there are obstacles to the implementation of the conception of CPTSD by Bhabinkamtibmas in combating criminal acts of terrorism.  The research method specifically uses this type of qualitative research with a normative juridical approach to the problem and an empirical approach. The types of data used are primary data and secondary data. Primary data were obtained from interviews with resource persons and secondary data from literature studies.  The results of the study indicate that the CPTSD model policy by Bhabinkamtibmas in overcoming criminal acts of terrorism is carried out through preventive, preemptive, and repressive efforts. Preventive efforts are supervision of chemicals that can be processed into explosives. Preemptive efforts are holding tabligh akbar and re-instilling Pancasila values ​​in society. The repressive effort is the establishment of the Anti-Terror Task Force. The obstacle in implementing the CPTSD model policy by Bhabinkamtibmas in overcoming criminal acts of terrorism is that Bhabinkamtibmas still lacks resources both in terms of quantity of members and in the field of facilities and infrastructure which includes the number of vehicles and task tools used to carry out Anjau Glare and binluh to the community. The Binmas Pioneer program through the CPTSD by Bhabinkamtibmas has not yet reached the target, so it has not been maximal in raising public awareness and preventing crime.

No abstract

No abstract

Pada dasarnya keberadaan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah melalui amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dilatarbelakangi akan adanya faktor demokratisasi dan upaya mengakomodasi daerah dalam pengambilan kebijakan nasional, secara teoritis keberadaan Dewan Perewakilan Daerah dimasudkan untuk menerapkan prinsip cheks and balances antar lembaga negara, yaitu adanya proses saling mengawasi dan mengimbangi antar lembaga Negara. Hal tersebut dilakukan untuk memperkuat hubungan pusat dan daerah demi menjaga keutuhan dan kesatuan Negara kesatuan republik Indonesia. Bila ditinjau dari perubahan sistem ketatanegaraan NKRI setelah reformasi 1998, kemunculan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagai lembaga tinggi negara, pada hakikatnya merupakan respons atas penolakan sistem pemerintahan otoritarian-oligarkhis-sentralistik yang dilaksanakan oleh rezim orde baru. Oleh sebab itu secara sistemik keberadaan DPD ini tidak mungkin dapat dilepaskan  dari perjalanan panjang yang terjadi dalam perdebatan Perubahan UUD 1945 dalam rangka mewujudkan sistem pemerintahan yang demokratis-desentralistik sebagai tuntutan utama gerakan reformasi 1998. Ditinjau dari perjalanan demokrasi DPD dimaksudkan untuk mendorong percepatan demokrasi, pembangunan dan kemajuan daerah-daerah secara serasi dan seimbang untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat. Sementara dasar pertimbangan teoritis dibentuknya DPD antara lain adalah untuk membangun mekanisme kontrol dan keseimbangan (check and balances) antar cabang kekuasaan negara danantar lembaga legislatif sendiri