Background: Cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CBR2) inhibits microglial reactivity through a molecular mechanism yet to be elucidated. We hypothesized that CBR2 activation induces an antiinflammatory phenotype in microglia by inhibiting extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway, via mitogen-activated protein kinase-phosphatase (MKP) induction. MKPs regulate mitogen activated protein kinases, but their role in the modulation of microglial phenotype is not fully understood.
Antinociceptive tolerance to opioids is a well-described phenomenon, which severely limits the clinical efficacy of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. The mechanisms that drive antinociceptive tolerance, however, are less well understood. We have previously shown that glia have a central role in the development of morphine tolerance and that administration of a glial modulating agent attenuated tolerance formation. Recently, we have demonstrated that morphine enhances microglial Iba1 expression and P2X 4 receptor-mediated microglial migration via direct μ opioid receptor signaling in in vitro microglial cultures. We hypothesize that P2X 4 receptors drive morphine tolerance and modulate morphine-induced spinal glial reactivity. Additionally, we hypothesize that perivascular microglia play a role in morphine tolerance and that P2X 4 receptor expression regulates perivascular microglia ED2 expression. To test these hypotheses, rats were implanted with osmotic minipumps releasing morphine or saline subcutaneously for seven days. Beginning three days prior to morphine treatment, P2X 4 receptor antisense oligonucleotide (asODN) was injected intrathecally daily, to selectively inhibit P2X 4 receptor expression. P2X 4 receptor asODN treatment inhibited morphine-induced P2X 4 receptor expression and blocked antinociceptive tolerance to systemically administered morphine. P2X 4 receptor asODN treatment also attenuated the morphine-dependent increase of spinal ionized calcium binding protein (Iba1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and μ opioid receptor protein expression. Chronic morphine also decreased perivascular microglial ED2 expression, which was reversed by P2X 4 receptor asODN. Together, these data suggest that modulation of P2X 4 receptor expression on microglia and perivascular microglia may prove an attractive target for adjuvant therapy to attenuate opioidinduced antinociceptive tolerance.
Inositol-requiring enzyme 1[α] (IRE1[α])–X-box binding protein spliced (XBP1) signaling maintains endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis while controlling immunometabolic processes. Yet, the physiological consequences of IRE1α–XBP1 activation in leukocytes remain unexplored. We found that induction of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2/Cox-2) and prostaglandin E synthase (Ptges/mPGES-1) was compromised in IRE1α-deficient myeloid cells undergoing ER stress or stimulated through pattern recognition receptors. Inducible biosynthesis of prostaglandins, including the pro-algesic mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), was decreased in myeloid cells that lack IRE1α or XBP1 but not other ER stress sensors. Functional XBP1 transactivated the human PTGS2 and PTGES genes to enable optimal PGE2 production. Mice that lack IRE1α–XBP1 in leukocytes, or that were treated with IRE1α inhibitors, demonstrated reduced pain behaviors in PGE2-dependent models of pain. Thus, IRE1α–XBP1 is a mediator of prostaglandin biosynthesis and a potential target to control pain.
Cannabis related online searches are associated with positive attitudes toward medical cannabis, particularly when information is obtained from dispensaries. Since pain is the main reason for medicinal cannabis use, information from dispensary websites has the potential to shape the attitude of pain patients towards cannabis. This is relevant because cannabis has demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain with low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations (< 5-10%), in contrast to potent cannabis (>15% THC), which is highly rewarded in the recreational realm. The role of CBD in pain is not clear, however it has gained popularity. Thus, we hypothesize that the potency of medical cannabis that is advertised online is similar to the cannabis advertised for recreational purposes, which would potentially create a misconception towards medical cannabis. The current lack of knowledge surrounding advertised potencies in the legal cannabis market limits the ability to generate clear policies regarding online advertising to protect patients that are willing to use cannabis for their condition. Thus, we evaluated the advertised THC and CBD content of cannabis products offered online in dispensaries in the United States to determine products' suitability to medicinal use and compare the strength of products offered in legal medical and recreational programs. We recorded THC and CBD concentrations for all herb cannabis products provided by dispensary websites and compared them between or within states. Four Western states (CA, CO, NM, WA) and five Northeastern states (ME, MA, NH, RI, VT) were included. A total of 8,505 cannabis products across 653 dispensaries were sampled. Despite the clear differences between medicinal and recreational uses of cannabis, the average THC concentration advertised online in medicinal programs was similar (19.2% ±6.2) to recreational programs (21.5% ±6.0) when compared between states with different programs, or between medicinal and recreational programs within the same states (CO or WA). Lower CBD concentrations accompanied higher THC products. The majority of products, regardless of medicinal or recreational programs, were advertised to have >15% THC (70.3%-91.4% of products). These stated concentrations seem unsuitable for medicinal purposes, particularly for patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, this information could induce the misconception that high potency cannabis is safe to treat pain. This data is consistent with reports in which THC and CBD in products from legal dispensaries or in
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.