No abstract

This study compares the utility of nonenzymatically glycosylated serum proteins (lys-GSP) to glycosylated hemoglobins (HbA1a-c) as control indices of glucose homeostasis in patients with IDDM. The diagnostic value of lys-GSP was also examined in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, and in two patients with insulinoma. The intraindividual fluctuation of lys-GSP in normoglycemic subjects is very small, resulting in an interindividual range of 3.0 +/- 0.3 lysine-bound glucose/mg protein (means +/- SD, N = 52). HbA1a-c with a normal range of 6.4 +/- 0.9% (N = 52) shows greater variability. In IDDM there is no overlap of lys-GSP levels between the normal and the diabetic range at the 95% confidence level. In patients treated with an open-loop insulin delivery system failure of normalization of the glucose balance was clearly discernible by an elevation of GSP. In contrast, in about 40% of the patients with incomplete glycemic control the HbA1a-c levels fell within the normal range. The utility of lys-GSP for diagnosis of diabetes is compared with the results of 60 oral glucose tolerance tests. Two patients suffering from insulinoma displayed decreased lys-GSP values. From these results it appears that determination of lys-GSP represents a more sensitive parameter for long-term control than HbA1a-c and is suitable for monitoring even small fluctuations of blood glucose.

To assess whether exercise-induced hypoglycaemia could be prevented by interruption of insulin infusion (3 h) we studied diabetic patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The studies were performed in 7 insulin-dependent diabetics (aged 31.4 +/- 4.8 (mean +/- SD) years, duration of diabetes 16.9 +/- 5.4 years), after an overnight fast and in the afternoon, 4 h after the last pre-meal bolus injection (exercise and control period). Bicycle exercise (45 min at 60% of maximum oxygen consumption) was started 30 min after the insulin infusion was stopped. During exercise there was a more pronounced decline in blood glucose in the afternoon (2.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, mean +/- SEM) than in the morning (1.4 +/- 0.4 mmol/l) (p less than 0.01). This corresponded to higher mean levels of free insulin during exercise in the afternoon (20 +/- 4.5 mU/I vs 12.0 +/- 1.0 mU/l, in the morning). Interruption of insulin delivery for 3 h resulted in a moderate increase of blood glucose, a gradual decrease of free insulin, and a moderate increase in free fatty acids and beta-hydroxybutyrate. During exercise in the afternoon 3 diabetics suffered from symptomatic hypoglycaemia (BG less than 2.8 mmol/l). In contrast with most of the other patients they showed no decline of free insulin during exercise. Thus even after interruption of basal rate insulin infusion moderate postprandial exercise may lead to hypoglycaemia if there is relative hyperinsulinism.

No abstract

Outpatient rheumatologic treatment in Germany is managed by rheumatologists in private practice (n = 557), by authorized rheumatism outpatient centers (n = 116), by rheumatism centers according to §116b (n = 43) and by university outpatient departments. A total number of 975 rheumatologists were registered by the end of 2012 of whom approximately 830 were active in outpatient care. With this number of rheumatologists Germany is in the middle range in comparison to eight industrial nations including the USA. This number is not sufficient to provide adequate medical care and the consequences are too long waiting times for an appointment with a rheumatologist. Statistical data of the Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians) showed 688,000 general insurance patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As some 68.9 % of the population are in this insurance scheme there are some 770,000 RA patients in Germany (almost 1 % of the population). One way to improve rheumatology care in spite of the lack of rheumatologists could be special agreements with the general health insurance providers to improve cooperation and division of responsibilities between rheumatologists and general practitioners, to implement patient education, tighter control and treat to target in rheumatology care. Another way could be a new treatment level called "ambulant specialist care", with no budget for medical care and no budget for the number of patients treated and therefore the chance for rheumatologists to treat more patients and have a better income. To achieve that more young doctors receive approval as a specialist in rheumatology, more chairs of rheumatology at universities and a nationwide stipendium for training assistants are needed.