SummaryGlass eels (Anguilla anguillu, L. 1758) caught during ascent at the mouth of the RiverTiber were kept in aquaria with freshwater and full strength salinity (35 %) for four months.Morphological features of glass eels at capture and after four months of experimental rearin are described. The structure of the gut, an important osmoregulatory organ, observed in $ass ee?s in seawater experimental rearing suggests that they undergo an irreversible process of a aptation to freshwater, despite the fact of survival in seawater.

Evolutionary theory suggests two alternative ways in which competitive interactions could vary in response to different levels of food abundance. Competition theory suggests that aggression should be greater when resource availability is lower, as an evolutionary stable strategy to access food. Alternatively, energy allocated to aggressive interactions should increase when the available spectrum of food resources is wider, in turn allowing a greater selec-tion. We tested these hypotheses on a group-living herbivore, the Apennine chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata. We compared social, aggressive and vigilance behaviour and relevant endocrine correlates across three areas: two 'poorer' areas, i.e. with a lower availability of nutritious pasture, and a 'richer' one. In the richer area, we observed: (1) the largest group size/greatest proportion of young individuals in groups; (2) the lowest rate/intensity of aggression between individuals, at feeding; (3) the lowest duration of vigilance and proportion of 'costly' vigilance, i.e. postures performed without chewing food; and (4) the lowest levels of testosterone and cortisol metabolites, suggesting a lower endogenous aggressiveness/stress response. Our findings agree with the competition theory, suggesting a role of food depletion in increasing aggression between foraging individuals, as an evolutionary stable strategy, with cascading effects on group phenology, vigilance and stress.

Antipredator strategies and social factors may influence vigilance behaviour in herbivores. Vigilance can differ between sex/age classes, but information is contradictory in the existing literature. We investigated sex/age differences of vigilance in fallow deer Dama dama, in a Mediterranean area. Females (> 1 year old) showed a lower proportion of time foraging and a greater alertness rate than males (≥ 1 years old). Decrease of vigilance with increasing group size was observed for females and adult males, but not for young and subadult males, suggesting that group-size effects on vigilance were not consistent across individuals of different sex/age classes. Most likely, females tended to reduce the predation risk for their offspring through a comparatively greater duration and frequency of vigilance. Young/subadult males showed a greater alertness than adult males, which may depend on intraspecific competition in larger groups. Both antipredator and social factors could explain sex/age differences of vigilance in fallow deer.

Social anxiety disorder is a common condition often associated with severe impairment in educational career. The aim of this paper was to evaluate prevalence rates and correlates of mild, moderate, and severe forms of social anxiety spectrum in a large sample of university students. Overall, 717 university students were assessed with the Social Anxiety Spectrum Self-Report questionnaire. Using two cut-off scores, 61.4% of subjects were classified as low scorers, 10% as medium scorers, and 28.6% as high scorers. Both high and medium scorers reported fears related to social situations. Interpersonal sensitivity and specific phobias were more common among women with low scores. Childhood/adolescence social anxiety features were more common among males with medium scores. Behavioral inhibition was more common among males with high scores. Functional impairment was severe among high scorers and, to a lesser extent, among medium scorers. Social anxiety spectrum is largely represented among university students. Future studies should investigate whether sufferers of social phobia underachieve or end their professional objectives prematurely.

Animal–Visitor Interactions (AVI) are activities offered by zoos and other tourism facilities, in which visitors come into close contact with animals. These activities can promote conservational and educational content, raise conservation mindedness and responsibility for the environment and animal welfare, but if not properly managed can jeopardize visitors’ and animals’ well-being and conservation efforts. The Animal-Visitor Interaction assessment Protocol (AVIP) has been designed to perform an integrated and multidisciplinary assessment of these activities, encompassing the “One Health, One Welfare” approach. AVIP throughout six different steps allows to assess the effects of AVIs both on animals, visitors, and the staff involved. Results can assist zoos to improve management decisions, ensure a transparent evaluation of their activities and promote conservation education goals. Lemurs walk-in enclosures have become increasingly popular among zoos, nevertheless studies focused on their assessment are still scarce. To validate AVIP to this particular AVI, we applied it to assess a walk-in enclosure hosting five Lemur catta in an Italian zoo. Results of behavioural and physiological analyses suggested no changes in animal welfare level and the Animal Welfare Risk Assessment showed low animal welfare risks. Two Visitor Experience Surveys were used to interview 291 visitors, showing that the assessed AVI could help promote the zoo’s conservation objectives and visitor education. Risk Assessment found low and medium risks to the health and safety of visitors. Results were then combined to perform a final ethical assessment. Some potential ethical concerns were detected, but the outcomes indicated that these conflicts were well managed. In the context of recent findings AVIP demonstrated its potential for application also in assessing AVIs involving primates. Our findings confirmed the usefulness of AVIP in assessing and monitoring AVIs, allowing to gain key information in a single process on multiple welfare-related parameters, educational impact, safety of the main stakeholders involved, and ethical concerns.