No abstract

In order to better understand the pituitary regulation of follicular growth in the domestic cat, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors (R) were localized and quantified in relation to follicle diameter and atresia using in situ ligand binding on ovarian sections. Expression of FSHR was homogeneous and restricted to follicle granulosa cells from the early antral stage onwards, whereas expression of LHR was heterogeneous on theca cells of all follicles from the early antral stage onward, and homogeneous on granulosa cells of healthy follicles larger than 800 microm in diameter and in corpora lutea. LHR were also widely expressed as heterogeneous aggregates in the ovarian interstitial tissue. Atretic follicles exhibited significantly reduced levels of both FSHR and LHR on granulosa cells, compared with healthy follicles whatever the follicular diameter, whereas levels of LHR on theca cells were lower only for atretic follicles larger than 1,600 microm in diameter. In healthy follicles, levels of FSHR and LHR in all follicular compartments increased significantly with diameter. Although generally comparable to that observed in other mammals, the expression pattern of gonadotropin receptors in the cat ovary is characterized by an early acquisition of LHR on granulosa cells of growing follicles and islets of LH binding sites in the ovarian interstitial tissue.

Background: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers.Materials and Methods: This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Caffeinated chewing gum and a serving of instant coffee, each containing ∼50 mg caffeine, were administered with blood samples collected before and up to 24 hours after administration starts. Plasma caffeine levels were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology.Results: There were no statistical differences between the two caffeine products in tmax (p = 0.3308) and ka (p = 0.3894). Although formulated at ∼50 mg caffeine each, mean dose released from chewing gum was ∼18% less than beverage. Dose-normalized area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax was similar between products. Although the criteria were not set a priori and the study was not powered for concluding bioequivalence, the 90% confidence intervals fell within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%.Conclusions: Existing scientific literature on caffeine, based mostly on data from caffeinated beverages, can be leveraged to support the safety of caffeine delivered by chewing gum and current maximum safe caffeine dose advice should be applicable irrespective of delivery method.