We report an ultrasensitive time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TRIFA) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The assay is an improvement of our previous report (Clin Chem 1993;39:2108-14) and includes the utilization of two monoclonal antibodies and a one-step incubation period, which greatly reduces analysis time. The new method demonstrates a superior lower analytical limit of detection (< or = 1 ng/L), a wide dynamic range, absence of a hook effect at 10(6) ng/L PSA, and equimolarity for free PSA and PSA-antichymotrypsin complex. Also, we have compared several aspects of our TRIFA with a commercially available third-generation assay (Immulite). An evaluation of breast tumor cytosol extracts from 315 patients shows PSA immunoreactivity > 15 ng/g of total protein in 28% and 23% by TRIFA and Immulite analysis, respectively. Both methods demonstrate a significant association between breast tumor PSA immunoreactivity and progesterone and estrogen receptor positivity (P <0.001). Analysis of serum samples obtained for monitoring of postradical prostatectomy patients reveals significant PSA changes at concentrations undetectable by conventional methods. The significance of these results as well as the potential applications of ultrasensitive PSA assays in breast and prostate cancers are discussed.
We used an ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay with a detection limit of 0.02 microgram/L for long-term monitoring of PSA changes in 5 patients who were cured by radical prostatectomy and in 10 patients who had failed prostatectomies; 5 patients who underwent cystoprostatectomy were also evaluated with one sample after surgery. Relapse-free periods, determined on the basis of criteria designed specifically for the ultrasensitive assay or proposed for other currently available PSA assays, were calculated for the patients with failed prostatectomies. Tumor-doubling times were also calculated, postsurgery, according to a model that assumes exponential tumor growth over time. We found that prostate cancer relapse, on average, could be diagnosed 420 or 883 days earlier with the ultrasensitive assay than with assays having detection limits of 0.1 or 0.3 microgram/L, respectively. Tumor-doubling times, calculated after radical prostatectomy, ranged from 67 to 568 days among the 10 patients. We also present evidence that even more-sensitive PSA assays might be able to further reduce the relapse-free periods in approximately 50% of the prostate cancer patients who ultimately relapse.
We report the measure of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from extracts of blood dried on filter paper. Five 3-mm (diameter) paper discs containing approximately 25 microL of dried whole blood were punched from the filter paper and extracted with 500 microL of buffer. Recovery of PSA was > 92%. Imprecision of the filter paper procedure was <10% when corresponding whole-blood concentrations were >0.35 micrograms/L. PSA recovery was unaffected whether blood was applied to the filter as one 85-microL aliquots, two 43-microL aliquots, or three 28-microL aliquots. PSA is contained in the plasma fraction. Variation in hematocrit from 0.61 to 0.31 caused <+/-10% change in filter paper PSA. Regression analysis showed: filter paper PSA = 0.86 whole-blood PSA - 0.02; Sy/x = 0.44. Men (153) without prostate cancer gave a 95th percentile of 4.8 micrograms /L. PSA in filter paper dried blood was stable for >1 month at -20 to 37 degrees C and showed no loss of recovery after being mailed to a hot climate. We conclude that the filter paper procedure can reliably distinguish normal from increased concentrations of PSA and that it could facilitate screening to detect occult prostate cancer in large-scale mail-in programs to centralized laboratories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.