Sulphasalazine prescribing is on the increase. Pulmonary toxicity and blood dyscrasias are rare side-effects. Numerous case reports have been published implicating sulphasalazine in pulmonary toxicity. The authors searched the literature for cases of sulphasalazine induced lung toxicity and the 50 cases identified are discussed here.All published case reports/letters referring to sulphasalazine and lung toxicity were studied. The search terms "sulphasalazine" and "sulfasalazine" were combined with the terms "lung", "pulmonary disease", "pneumonitis" and "pleuritis" using Medline and PubMed databases.Typical presentation of sulphasalazine-induced lung disease was with new onset dyspnoea and infiltrates on chest radiography. Common symptoms were cough and fever. Crepitations on auscultation and peripheral eosinophilia were noted in half of the cases. Sputum production, allergy history, rash, chest pain and weight loss were inconsistent findings. Pulmonary pathology was variable, the commonest being eosinophilic pneumonia with peripheral eosinophilia and interstitial inflammation with or without fibrosis. Fatal reports were infrequent. Most patients were managed by drug withdrawal with 40% prescribed corticosteroids.In conclusion, sulphasalazine lung disease should be distinguished from interstitial lung disease due to underlying primary disease. Despite the increase in sulphasalazine prescribing, pulmonary toxicity remains rare. The majority of patients with suspected sulphasalazine-induced lung disease improved within weeks of drug withdrawal and the need for corticosteroids is debatable. Sulphasalazine has been used worldwide since the 19409s when it was first prescribed for ulcerative colitis. Its use in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is declining with the availability of newer nonsulphur containing aminosalicylates. Conversely, its use as a disease-modifying antirheumatoid drug (DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is well known [1], its pattern of prescribing by rheumatologists is changing with the development of combination therapies and earlier prescribing of DMARD9s in the course of the disease [2,3]. Overall prescribing of sulphasalazine is on the increase. Information provided from the statistics division 1E of the Department of Health shows that in the decade 1980-1990 there were 4.3 million prescriptions for sulphasalazine with 652 million tablets prescribed. In the last decade to 1998 there were 4.6 million prescriptions with 698 million tablets prescribed.Sulphasalazine has clinically important side-effects in up to one-fifth of patients but these are mostly nausea and vomiting, skin rashes, arthralgia, fever and hepatic dysfunction. More serious side-effects include pulmonary toxicity and blood dyscrasias. Early case reports of adverse effects were published in the 19609s [4] and knowledge of adverse pulmonary effects is not new [5][6][7]. Numerous case reports have been published in the last 30 yrs implicating sulphasalazine in pulmonary toxicity. The presen...
Compared with 2000, there has been a marked increase in the number of patients referred for, and currently using, NIV (2.6 and 3.4-fold, respectively). The proportion successfully established on NIV has also increased, suggesting more appropriate selection and/or improvement in the methods of using NIV in this challenging group of patients. However, monitoring of respiratory function is suboptimal and uncontrolled oxygen is sometimes used inappropriately before the terminal phase.
In a dose response study 12 patients with chronic bronchitis and airflow obstruction received inhaled placebo and incremental doses of oxitropium bromide. Significant improvements in peak expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in one second, and forced vital capacity were recorded at all times up to 10 hours after all doses of oxitropium bromide. Oxitropium bromide is an effective bronchodilator in chronic bronchitis with an optimal dose of 400-600 ,g.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.