Recent regulatory pressures (e.g., REACh, CEPA) requiring bioaccumulation assessments and the need for reduced animal use have increased the necessity for the development of in vitro-based methods to estimate bioaccumulation. Our study explored the potential use of subcellular and cellular hepatic systems to determine the biotransformation potential of two surfactants: octaethylene glycol monohexadecyl ether (C16EO8) and diethylene glycol monotetradecyl ether sulfate (C14EO2S). The subcellular systems tested were liver homogenates and microsomes from the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Cellular systems consisted of primary hepatocytes from the common carp (C. carpio) and PLHC-1 cells, hepatocarcinoma cells from the desert topminnow (Poeciliopsis lucida) cell line. Each in vitro system was exposed to radiolabeled test compounds and assayed for biotransformation using liquid scintillation and thin layer chromatographic methods. First-order kinetics were used to estimate rates of biotransformation. Bioconcentration of test materials in fish were predicted using an in vitro to in vivo metabolic rate extrapolation model linked to a mass-balance model commonly used to predict bioaccumulation in fish. Both subcellular and cellular tests using microsomes, liver homogenates and hepatocytes respectively showed biotransformation of the parent surfactants. Biotransformation rates were fastest for hepatocytes, followed by microsomes and homogenates. Rates were too low from homogenate tests to extrapolate to in vivo-based biotransformation rates using the extrapolation model. Trout microsomes metabolized C16EO8 faster than carp microsomes, yet rates were approximately the same for C14EO2S. Predicted BCF values incorporating in vitro biotransformation rates from hepatocytes were similar to measured in vivo or USEPA's bioconcentration model (BCFWIN) predicted values. Predicted BCF values using microsomal-based rates from trout and carp studies were only slightly less than default BCF values which assumes a linear logKow to BCF relationship with no biotransformation. However, hepatocyte-based results showed substantially decreased BCFs compared to the default BCF values. These results indicate that BCF estimates based on in vitro metabolic rates can provide reasonable estimates of in vivo BCF values, therefore, supporting the use of in vitro approaches within a tiered approach to assess bioconcentration.
1. The biotransformation of pentachlorophenol (PCP), aniline and biphenyl in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) isolated liver cells was investigated to examine if fish hepatocytes represent a suitable alternative to the in vivo approach for studying the biotransformation of chemicals. Each compound was incubated at two concentrations (10 and 60 microM) for 2 h. For comparison, the metabolic profile of these xenobiotics was also studied in urine and bile of trout orally exposed to 1.8-4.0 mg/kg wet wt of each compound. 2. In vitro as in vivo, PCP glucuronide and to a lesser extent PCP sulphate were the metabolites formed by trout from PCP. 3. Aniline was mainly metabolized to acetanilide and to a lesser extent to 2-aminophenol by isolated hepatocytes, but neither hydroxylated acetanilide nor conjugates were found in vitro whereas they were present in bile and urine of trout treated with this chemical. 4. Trout hepatocytes metabolized biphenyl to hydroxylated and dihydroxylated products and the corresponding glucuronides. These results correlated well with the metabolic profile obtained from the bile of trout exposed to this pesticide. 5. It is concluded that although hepatocytes are well suited for several types of biotransformation studies, the fact that this system may in some cases produce a different metabolic pattern than in vivo should be considered when attempting to extrapolate in vitro to in vivo data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.