Alterations of heart rhythm are a common clinical event. They can be caused by almost any kind of heart disorder. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of abnormal heart rhythm. Prevalence of AF in the general population is 1-2%, and given that AF incidence rate continues to increase it can be predicted that the number of patients will be doubled within the next 50 years. This review provides the most recent diagnostic and treatment methods, including both unique domestic antiarrhythmic drugs and non - drug methods for AF treatment which were developed and implemented in clinical practice at NMRC of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Purpose: to assess cardiac electrophysiological parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), lone or with concomitant arterial hypertension (AH), and their prognostic significance relative to treatment effectiveness.Materials and methods. We included in this study 184 patients with paroxysmal AF (84 with concomitant AH and 100 with presumed lone AF). Cardiac electrophysiological study was performed in accordance with standardized protocol that included assessment of sinus node recovery time, sinoatrial, intraatrial and interatrial conduction time, and effective refractory periods (ERP) of right and left atria and atrioventricular node. Patients with inducible supraventricular reentrant arrhythmias that could potentially trigger AF underwent catheter radiofrequency ablation of those arrhythmias. Other patients received either antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD; n=79) or catheter cryo-ablation (CBA; n=81). Treatment was considered ineffective in case of any symptomatic or asymptomatic AF episode documented by ECG or Holter ECG within 12 months of follow-up.Results. Patients with lone AF compared with those with AH had shorter ERP of the right atrium (219±21 ms vs. 253±44 ms, respectively, p<0.05) and more prominent dispersion of ERP of right and left atria (median 40 ms, interquartile range 10-50 ms vs. median 20 ms, interquartile range 10-22.5 ms, respectively, p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in other electrophysiology parameters between the groups. Sustained supraventricular reentrant arrhythmias were induced in 9% (9 of 100) patients with presumed lone AF and in 1.2% (1 of 84) patients with AH (p<0.05). All these arrhythmias were successfully ablated, and patients had no AF recurrence during 12-month follow-up. Among other patient treatment (CBA n=81, AAD n=79) was effective in 64% of those with lone AFib and in 34% - with AH (p<0.05). In multivariate multiple regression analysis, none of electrophysiological parameters could be assumed as a factor associated with the efficacy of CBA or AAD. Conclusion. Patients with lone AF had more prominent atrial electrophysiological inhomogeneity compared with patients with concomitant AH. Cardiac electrophysiological parameters had no influence on effectiveness of antiarrhythmic treatment.
Aim. We aimed to assess autoantibodies to M2-cholinoceptors (M2-CR) in patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation (AF) and in patients with AF and arterial hypertension (AH). Materials and methods. 100 patients with lone AF and 84 patients with AF and AH were included. Patients underwent clinical blood and urinalysis, assessment of biochemistry blood panel, 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, echocardiography and stress - testing (treadmill or stress - echocardiography). Assessment of IgM and IgG autoantibodies to M2-CR was performed by indirect immunoenzyme assay. The following peptide molecules were used as epitopes for detection of autoantibodies: M1 - amino acid sequence YTVIGYWPLGVVCDL (83-98) of the first extracellular loop of M2-CR; M2 - sequence VRTVEDGECYIQFFSNAAVTFGTAI (168-192) of the second extracellular loop of M2-CR; M3 - sequence NTFCAPCIPNTV (410-421) of the third extracellular loop of M2-CR; M4 - short sequence VEDGECYIQFFS (171-182) of the second extracellular loop of M2-CR; M1+M4 - chimeric molecule formed by sequences of the first and the second extracellular loops of M2-CR connected by disulfide bound YTVIGYWPLGVVCDL + VEDGECYIQFFS (83-98 + 171-182). Results. Autoantibodies to M2-CR were found in 45% patients with lone AF and in 35% patients with AF and AH. In patients with lone AF prevalence of increased IgG to M2-CR were greater than in patients with AF and AH (32% vs 20%; p
Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most frequenly encountered arrhythmia. In the majority of cases AFib occurs in patients with cardiovascular diseases such as arterial hypertension (AH). In 10–15% of cases AFib occurs in the absense of comorbidities in structurally normal heart. It is reffered to as “lone AFib” and the cause of this arrhythmia remains unknown. Activation of cardiac M2-actylcholinoreceptors (M2-CR) leads to decrease in duration of atrial refractory periods that may contribute to development of AFib. Autoantibodies against M2-CR has cholinomimetic properties, but role of these autoantibodies in development and maintenance of AFib has not been studied. Purpose To assess autoantibodies against M2-CR in patients with paroxysmal lone AFib, in patients with AFib and AH and healthy people. Methods 100 patints with lone Afib, 100 patients with Afib and AH and 25 healthy people were included. Patients underwent clinical blood and urinlysis, assessment of biochemistry blood panel, 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, echocardiography and stress-testing (treadmill or stress-echocardiography). Assesment of IgM and IgG autoantibodies to M2-CR was performed by indirect immunoenzyme assay. The following peptide molecules were used as epitopes for detection of autoantibodies: M1-amino acid sequence YTVIGYWPLGVVCDL (83–98) of the first extracellular loop of M2-CR; M2-sequence VRTVEDGECYIQFFSNAAVTFGTAI (168–192) of the second extracellular loop of M2-CR; M3-sequence NTFCAPCIPNTV (410–421) of the third extracellular loop of M2-CR, M4-short sequence VEDGECYIQFFS (171–182) of the second extracellular loop of M2-CR; M1+M4-chimeric molecule formed by sequences of the first and the second extacellular loops of M2-CR connected by disulfide bound YTVIGYWPLGVVCDL+VEDGECTIQFFS (83–98+171–182). Results IgG to M2-CR were found in 32% of patients with AFib and in 12% of healthy subjects (p<0,05). IgM to M2-CR were found in 25% of patients with AFib and in 32% of healthy subjects (p<0,05). In patients with lone AFib prevalence of IgG to M2-CR were greater than in patients with AFib and AH (39% vs 25%; p<0,05). Patients with lone AFib and AFib and AH had higher prevalence of IgG to all amino-acid sequences and difference was statistically significant for M2, M4, M1+M4 epitopes (see fig.). Prevalence of IgG to M2-CR epitopes Conclusion Higher prevalence of IgG to M2-CR in patients with AFib than in healthy subjects may suppose an active role of autoimmune processes in arrhythmogenesis.