The natural history of alloimmunization to the PlA1 platelet antigen is uncertain. We followed 50 PlA1-negative pregnant women during pregnancy and for 6 months post-partum in order to determine this natural history. The cohort of PlA1-negative women was obtained by PlA1 typing 5000 women. Three PlA1-negative women formed anti-PlA1 antibodies during this prospective study, two in pregnancy and one in the immediate post-partum period. All three PlA1 antibody producers were HLA-DR3 positive, a histocompatibility phenotype that is strongly associated with alloimmunization to the PlA1 antigen. One of the three infants delivered to these mothers was thrombocytopenic (platelet count 9 x 10(9)/l). The remaining two infants had normal platelet counts at birth (160 and 174 x 10(9)/l). The HLA-A1, -B8, -DR3 and -DRw52 phenotype frequencies in the group of PlA1-negative women who did not form PlA1 antibodies (n = 47) was similar to that found in their husbands, and that expected in a normal Caucasian population. From our data we estimate that alloimmunization to the PlA1 antigen occurs in approximately one out of every 1000 pregnancies in a Caucasian population. It is important to recognize that not all pregnancies in which a mother has formed PlA1 alloantibodies will result in the delivery of a thrombocytopenic infant. These findings are relevant to programs designed to either prevent alloimmunization to the PlA1 antigen (through passive administration of anti-PlA1 immunoglobulin to at-risk PlA1-negative mothers), or to identify women at risk of delivery of thrombocytopenic infants (by antenatal screening to detect women alloimmunized to the PlA1 antigen).
Background and Objectives: Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions frequently accompany platelet transfusions and may be due to accumulation of cytokines mediating inflammation during storage of platelet concentrates (PCs). We wished to determine whether PCs collected using the COBE® SpectraTM Apheresis System (Version 4) were sufficiently leukocyte reduced (LR) to limit cytokine accumulation during storage. Materials and Methods: Cytokine accumulation – interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) – and release of platelet α-granule – P-selectin, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor AB (PDGF-AB), von Willebrand factor (vWf) – or dense granule (serotonin) markers were investigated during a 7-day storage period comparing apheresis-collected, LR PCs (LR PCs) and random donor platelets prepared from whole blood (WB). Results: Leukocyte counts were reduced 99.95% comparing LR PCs (5.7 × 105/l) and WB PCs (1.09 × 109/l). Little or no accumulation of leukocyte-derived cytokines was observed in LR PCs during storage in contrast to WB PCs. A reduction in the release of platelet α-granule proteins, such as P-selectin, TGF-β1 and PDGF-AB, was observed on day 0 for LR PCs compared to WB PCs with little or no difference observed from day 3 to 7. Plasma vWf levels were higher in LR PCs compared to WB PCs on days 0–7. Conclusion: Leukocyte levels in PCs collected with the COBE Spectra Apheresis System are sufficiently low to limit cytokine production during 7 days of storage.
The overall error rate for HPA-1-6 genotyping decreased from 2.7% in the tenth workshop to 0.8% in the eleventh workshop. The majority of laboratories were able to perform Gov genotyping, although the error rate was 7.5%. Detection of common clinically significant antibodies was good, although detection of the much rarer HPA-2b was problematic. There was considerable progress in the detection of anti-Gova. The lack of consensus over treatment of NAIT demonstrates uncertainty over optimal management of these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.