Biofertilizers are becoming increasingly popular in many countries and for many crops, but very few studies on their effect on grain yield have been conducted in rice. Therefore, we evaluated three different biofertilizers (based on Azospirillum, Trichoderma, or unidentified rhizobacteria) in the Philippines during four cropping seasons between 2009 and 2011, using four different fertilizer rates (100% of the recommended rate [RR], 50% RR, 25% RR, and no fertilizer as Control). The experiments were conducted under fully irrigated conditions in a typical lowland rice environment. Significant yield increases due to biofertilizer use were observed in all experimental seasons with the exception of the 2008/09 DS. However, the effect on rice grain yield varied between biofertilizers, seasons, and fertilizer treatments. In relative terms, the seasonal yield increase across fertilizer treatments was between 5% and 18% for the best biofertilizer (Azospirillum-based), but went up to 24% in individual treatments. Absolute grain yield increases due to biofertilizer were usually below 0.5 t·ha−1, corresponding to an estimated additional N uptake of less than 7.5 kg N ha−1. The biofertilizer effect on yield did not significantly interact with the inorganic fertilizer rate used but the best effects on grain yield were achieved at low to medium fertilizer rates. Nevertheless, positive effects of the biofertilizers even occurred at grain yields up to 5 t·ha−1. However, the trends in our results seem to indicate that biofertilizers might be most helpful in rainfed environments with limited inorganic fertilizer input. However, for use in these target environments, biofertilizers need to be evaluated under conditions with abiotic stresses typical of such systems such as drought, soil acidity, or low soil fertility
The impact of O2 deficiency on the interaction of banana
roots and the Fusarium wilt pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum
f. sp. cubense (Foc), was determined on the basis of
changes in the activities of enzymes involved in phenol metabolism
(phenylalanine ammonia lyase, PAL, and peroxidase, PER). The root systems of
banana cultivars differing in their known field resistance to Fusarium wilt
were either inoculated with Foc or not and either continuously aerated,
continuously exposed to hypoxia, or exposed to hypoxia for 48 h and then
reaerated.
Hypoxia stimulated PAL and PER activities in nodal roots of bananas and Foc
inoculation stimulated PER activity. Hypoxia, in the presence of Foc, affected
PAL activity among cultivars in a manner consistent with their observed field
resistance to Fusarium wilt. Foc inoculation increased PER activity in all
cultivars over and above that caused by hypoxia alone. Foc inoculation,
followed by hypoxia, affected the cultivars differently, with the
corresponding changes in PER activity seemingly correlated with their
resistance to Fusarium wilt.
The resistant cultivar Goldfinger has an inherently higher capability of
stimulating the production of PAL and PER enzymes than cv. Williams (normally
resistant to Fusarium wilt but succumbs when waterlogged) or cv. Gros Michel
(susceptible). While Williams could respond to hypoxia by increasing PAL and
PER activities more than Gros Michel, the elicited level of activity may not
be enough to prevent disease development under waterlogged conditions. While
hypoxic treatment might be a way to stimulate the root’s defence
mechanism, it has to be at a level, duration and timing that would enhance PER
and PAL activities without causing irreparable damage to root functions.
Postanoxic injury, for example, could impair host resistance to wilt.
The differences in rapidity and degree of increase in PAL and PER activities
under Foc inoculation, followed by hypoxia, appear to be associated with
resistance to Fusarium wilt. The breakdown in resistance of Williams (a
Cavendish cultivar) observed during waterlogging, needs further investigation,
especially if PAL is synthesised in the more aerated parts of the root, away
from the stele where the defence mechanism needs to operate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.