Entrepreneurship educators can assess their students by focusing on leadership self-efficacy dimensions that align with desirable entrepreneurship behaviors. To support this claim, we used the Student Leadership Practices Inventory (S-LPI) to survey a group of 46 undergraduate students in Mexico and 49 undergraduate students in Spain that were involved in entrepreneurship education programs. Independent samples t-tests show statistically significant differences between the two groups. We also compared the whole sample in terms of gender and found no differences. We propose that educators integrate Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership model into de design and assessment of their curricular and cocurricular entrepreneurship development programs. Specifically, the model serves educators from different countries, in this case Mexico and Spain, by identifying the leadership behaviors that their students enact. By integrating the five practices of exemplary leadership model, educators can account for variables like nation of origin and gender, and identify differences between groups.

No abstract

Faculty members from a higher education institution in northwestern Mexico created the FORTES program, designed to develop leadership competencies among undergraduate students and thus contribute to their future success in life. To address the need to assess the FORTES program, educators asked the students enrolled in the program to respond to the Student Leadership Practices Inventory (S-LPI). The results of the survey suggest that the leadership competencies of the students in the program are consistent with a transformational leadership model. This type of effort holds some promise to help narrow the gender gap in leadership education. The main contribution of this study is to provide educators involved in student leadership development outside the United States with an instrument to assess leadership competencies among students.

<p>The cost of food in Mexico has increased over several decades while modern retailers face intense rivalry. Currently, consumers have several choices for buying food, which prompts retail managers to implement pricing strategies designed to differentiate from competitors and attract more customers. The problem is that several retailers seem to be using the same approach without a clear understanding of consumer price sensitivity, the effect of non-price promotions, and the variations across retail formats. This research will address these issues by analyzing scanner sales data and mystery shopper price reports to calculate price sensitivity across six food categories sold in four retail chains. Results indicate that product demand, in most food categories, is sensitive to price changes at big-box retail competitors and not traditional supermarket retailers. Additionally, results indicate that the six food categories in the study are sensitive to feature advertising. Retail managers can use these findings to help define their value propositions, focus their pricing strategies, and inform their marketing communications strategy.<strong></strong></p>

No abstract