The incidence of pediatric hypertension (HTN) is increasing, mainly due to an increase in primary (essential) HTN, or PH. There are only a limited number of studies assessing the characteristics and treatment efficacy of PH versus secondary HTN (SH). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 158 pediatric patients (mean age: 10.8 years; sex ratio: 51.1% female, 48.9% male) with HTN of whom 34.4% had PH and 65.6% had SH. The vast majority were either African-American or Caucasian. Among all patients, therapy induced a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (both p<0.0001). SBP (p<0.0001) and DBP (p=0.002) declined significantly in PH patients. PH and SH patients with a body mass index (BMI) >95th percentile (%) had a significantly higher post-therapy SBP (both p<0.05) than those with a BMI <95th%. SBP declined similarly in PH patients treated with calcium-channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). DBP declined only in PH patients treated with ACEI. SBP and DBP (both p<0.0001) declined significantly in SH patients. Post-therapy BP was similar in SH patients treated with either CCB or ACEI. Post-therapy SBP and DBP were significantly lower in SH patients than in PH patients; moreover, therapy induced a greater decline in SBP and DBP in the SH patients. Compared to PH patients, SH patients were twofold more likely to achieve a SBP less than the 95th% after therapy. We conclude that (1) significant lowering of BP with either CCB or ACEI is achievable in most children with HTN, and (2) SH patients respond better to therapy than those with PH.
We present a case with extremely late diagnosis of type II hereditary angioedema (HAE). Given recent advances in HAE treatment, we want to bring physician awareness to this condition and aid in earlier detection. HAE is a disorder associated with episodes of angioedema of the face, larynx, lips, abdomen, or extremities. Late diagnosis of HAE can lead to significant morbidity and is severely impairing due to recurring attacks. The diagnosis of HAE is ordinarily made during childhood and adolescence. Delayed diagnoses in early and middle adulthood have been documented in the literature. Gastrointestinal symptoms are common features of HAE and can be misdiagnosed as disease of primary gastrointestinal pathology, such as irritable bowel syndrome, recurrent pancreatitis, or appendicitis. These attacks are characterized by recurrent attacks of subcutaneous and submucosal edema without the presence of urticaria.We present a case of an elderly veteran whose diagnoses was extremely delayed into the eighth decade of life subsequent to unexplained abdominal symptoms. After diagnosis, the patient's symptoms were well controlled with medication due to advances in HAE treatment. To prevent further atypically delayed diagnoses, physicians should consider HAE in patients with recurrent attacks of unexplained abdominal pain.
In two randomized double-blind studies, twice-daily GSP301 nasal spray-a fixed-dose combination of olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate-significantly improved reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) versus placebo (primary endpoint; presented elsewhere). GSP301 onset of action and reflective total ocular symptom scores (rTOSS) are presented here. METHODS: In each study (study 1 [NCT02631551]; study 2 [NCT02870205]), patients > _12 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) were equally randomized to GSP301 (olopatadine 665mg/mometasone 25mg BID), olopatadine (665mg BID), mometasone (25mg BID), or placebo for 14 days. GSP301 onset of action was assessed by mean change from baseline in average instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS) at various timepoints (from 15 minutes to 4 hours post-dose) versus placebo and analyzed via mixed-effect model repeated measures, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1,180 and 1,176 patients were randomized in studies 1 and 2, respectively. A rapid onset of action for GSP301 was observed at 15 minutes post-dose versus placebo in study 1 (least squares mean difference [95%
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.