No abstract

We analyzed gaze shifts made by trained rhesus monkeys with completely unrestrained heads during performance of a delayed gaze shift task. Subjects made horizontal, vertical, and oblique gaze shifts to visual targets. We found that coordinated eye-head movements are characterized by a set of lawful relationships, and that the initial position of the eyes in the orbits and the direction of the gaze shift are two factors that influence these relationships. Head movements did not contribute to the change in gaze position during small gaze shifts (<20 degrees) directed along the horizontal meridian, when the eyes were initially centered in the orbits. For larger gaze shifts (25-90 degrees), the head contribution to the gaze shift increased linearly with increasing gaze shift amplitude, and eye movement amplitude saturated at an asymptotic amplitude of approximately 35 degrees. When the eyes began deviated in the orbits contralateral to the direction of the ensuing gaze shift, the head contributed less and the eyes more to amplitude-matched gaze shifts. The relative timing of eye and head movements was altered by initial eye position; head latency relative to gaze onset increased as the eyes began in more contralateral initial positions. The direction of the gaze shift also affected the relative amplitudes of eye and head movements; as gaze shifts were made in progressively more vertical directions, eye amplitude increased and head contribution declined systematically. Eye velocity was a saturating function of gaze amplitude for movements without a head contribution (gaze amplitude <20 degrees). As head contribution increased with increasing gaze amplitude (20-60 degrees), peak eye velocity declined by >200 degrees/s and head velocity increased by 100 degrees/s. For constant-amplitude eye movements (approximately 30 degrees), eye velocity declined as the velocity of the concurrent head movement increased. On the basis of these relationships, it is possible to accurately predict gaze amplitude, the amplitudes of the eye and head components of the gaze shift, and gaze, eye, and head velocities, durations and latencies if the two-dimensional displacement of the target and the initial position of the eyes in the orbits are known. These data indicate that signals related to the initial positions of the eyes in the orbits and the direction of the gaze shift influence separate eye and head movement commands. The hypothesis that this divergence of eye and head commands occurs downstream from the superior colliculus is supported by recent electrical stimulation and single-unit recording data.

Changing the direction of the line of sight is essential for the visual exploration of our environment. When the head does not move, re-orientation of the visual axis is accomplished with high velocity, conjugate movements of the eyes known as saccades. Our understanding of the neural mechanisms that control saccadic eye movements has advanced rapidly as specific hypotheses have been developed, evaluated and sometimes rejected on the basis of new observations. Constraints on new hypotheses and new tests of existing models have often arisen from the careful assessment of behavioral observations. The definition of the set of features (or rules) of saccadic eye movements was critical in the development of hypotheses of their neural control.When the head is free to move, changes in the direction of the line of sight can involve simultaneous saccadic eye movements and movements of the head. When the head moves in conjunction with the eyes to accomplish these shifts in gaze direction, the rules that helped define head-restrained saccadic eye movements are altered. For example, the slope relationship between duration and amplitude for saccadic eye movements is reversed (the slope is negative) during gaze shifts of similar amplitude initiated with the eyes in different orbital positions. Modifications to the hypotheses developed in head-restrained subjects may be needed to account for these new observations. This review briefly recounts features of head-restrained saccadic eye movements, and then describes some of the characteristics of coordinated eye-head movements that have led to development of new hypotheses describing the mechanisms of gaze shift control. Scope of this ReviewThe goal of this review is to present and discuss the development of ideas about the mechanisms that control visual orienting movements. An appreciation of the rules that characterize the coordination of the eyes and head is a critical step in constraining and possibly rejecting alternative hypotheses describing their control. Development of specific models of gaze control, and designing neurophysiological experiments that further define the implementation of these mechanisms has been and continues to be dependent upon a clear understanding of how the eyes and head move together in order to redirect the line of sight. This review will focus on eye-head coordination and the kinematics (temporal progression) of gaze shifts, the alterations of saccadic eye movements that occur when coupled with movements of the head, and how these observations have influenced formal descriptions of this system. Visual orienting behaviors will be emphasized and data from non-human primates will be discussed in detail. In addition, movements to targets displaced along the horizontal meridian will be the primary focus; there has been significantly less work on vertical and oblique gaze shifts (although see (Tomlinson and Bahra 1986a;Tweed et al. 1995;Goossens and vanOpstal 1997;Freedman 2005;Freedman and Cecala 2008)). The neural elements and description of ...

1. We electrically stimulated the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in two rhesus macaques free to move their heads both vertically and horizontally (head unrestrained). Stimulation of the primate SC can elicit high-velocity, combined, eye-head gaze shifts that are similar to visually guided gaze shifts of comparable amplitude and direction. The amplitude of gaze shifts produced by collicular stimulation depends on the site of stimulation and on the parameters of stimulation (frequency, current, and duration of the stimulation train). 2. The maximal amplitude gaze shifts, produced by electrical stimulation at 56 sites in the SC of two rhesus monkeys, ranged in amplitude from approximately 7 to approximately 80 deg. Because the head was unrestrained, stimulation-induced gaze shifts often included movements of the head. Head movements produced at the 56 stimulation sites ranged in amplitude from 0 to approximately 70 deg. 3. The relationships between peak velocity and amplitude and between duration and amplitude of stimulation-induced head movements and gaze shifts were comparable with the relationships observed during visually guided gaze shifts. The relative contributions of the eyes and head to visually guided and stimulation-induced gaze shifts were also similar. 4. As was true for visually guided gaze shifts, the head contribution to stimulation-induced gaze shifts depended on the position of the eyes relative to the head at the onset of stimulation. When the eyes were deviated in the direction of the ensuing gaze shift, the head contribution increased and the latency to head movement onset was decreased. 5. We systematically altered the duration of stimulation trains (10-400 ms) while stimulation frequency and current remained constant. Increases in stimulation duration systematically increased the amplitude of the evoked gaze shift until a site specific maximal amplitude was reached. Further increases in stimulation duration did not increase gaze amplitude. There was a high correlation between the end of the stimulation train and the end of the evoked gaze shift for movements smaller than the site-specific maximal amplitude. 6. Unlike the effects of stimulation duration on gaze amplitude, the amplitude and duration of evoked head movements did not saturate for the range of durations tested (10-400 ms), but continued to increase linearly with increases in stimulation duration. 7. The frequency of stimulation was systematically varied (range: 63-1,000 Hz) while other stimulation parameters remained constant. The velocity of evoked gaze shifts was related to the frequency of stimulation; higher stimulation frequencies resulted in higher peak velocities. The maximal, site-specific amplitude was independent of stimulation frequency. 8. When stimulating a single collicular site using identical stimulation parameters, the amplitude and direction of stimulation-induced gaze shifts, initiated from different initial positions, were relatively constant. In contrast, the amplitude and directio...

1. Microstimulation is used to investigate how activity in the superior colliculus (SC) contributes to determining the properties of primate saccadic eye movements. The site of collicular stimulation, the duration of the stimulation train, and the frequency of the stimulation train are each varied to examine the relative contributions of the locus, duration, and level of collicular activity to determining saccade amplitude, direction, duration, and velocity. 2. For any given site of stimulation, a relationship between movement amplitude and train duration can be demonstrated. Movement amplitude is a monotonically increasing, but saturating, function of increasing train duration. The size of the largest movement is dictated by the site of stimulation. Within the range over which amplitude can be modulated, movement offset is linked to the offset of the stimulation train. As a result, each decrement or increment in train duration produces a corresponding decrement or increment in movement duration. 3. The peak velocity of an evoked movement is influenced by the frequency of stimulation; a higher frequency of stimulation produces a movement of higher velocity. 4. The effects of train duration and frequency can be traded to produce movements that have comparable amplitudes but different dynamic characteristics; high-velocity movements of short duration and low-velocity movements of long duration can be produced by stimulating with high-frequency, short-duration, and low-frequency, long-duration trains, respectively. Across stimulation frequencies, the amplitude of an evoked movement is best related to the total number of pulses in the stimulation train. 5. Because it is possible to compensate for reduced velocity by increasing the duration of the stimulation train, the same site-specific maximum amplitude can be attained with different frequencies of stimulation. 6. Small, but significant, changes in movement direction occur as a result of varying train duration or train frequency. 7. The latency to movement onset (i.e., interval from stimulation onset to movement onset) depends upon the frequency of stimulation. A higher frequency of stimulation produces a movement of shorter latency. 8. These data demonstrate that both the site of stimulation and the parameters of stimulation contribute to determining the properties of a movement evoked from the primate SC. In doing so, they contradict the results of early microstimulation studies that suggest that the properties of eye movements evoked from the primate SC are determined solely by the site of stimulation. The findings conflict with the traditional view of collicular function that suggests that the collicular motor representation is purely anatomic. Rather, these data support a revised view whereby the locus, duration, and level of collicular activity contribute to determining the properties of a primate saccadic eye movement. According to this view, independent information relating to desired displacement and saccade velocity are extracted from the spatiotemporal p...